Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography.

In mammography, thick or dense breast regions persistently suffer from reduced contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) because of degraded contrast from large scatter intensities and relatively high noise. Area x-ray beam equalization can improve image quality by increasing the x-ray exposure to under-penetrated regions without increasing the exposure to other breast regions. Optimal equalization parameters with respect to image quality and patient dose were determined through computer simulations and validated with experimental observations on a step phantom and an anthropomorphic breast phantom. Three parameters important in equalization digital mammography were considered: attenuator material (Z = 13-92), beam energy (22-34 kVp) and equalization level. A Mo/Mo digital mammography system was used for image acquisition. A prototype 16 x 16 piston driven equalization system was used for preparing patient-specific equalization masks. Simulation studies showed that a molybdenum attenuator and an equalization level of 20 were optimal for improving contrast, CNR and figure of merit (FOM = CNR2/dose). Experimental measurements using these parameters showed significant improvements in contrast, CNR and FOM. Moreover, equalized images of a breast phantom showed improved image quality. These results indicate that area beam equalization can improve image quality in digital mammography.

[1]  J A Seibert,et al.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  L Costaridou,et al.  Evaluation of an anatomical filter-based exposure equalization technique in mammography. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  R Fahrig,et al.  A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Dobbins,et al.  Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest. , 1989, Radiology.

[5]  D B Plewes,et al.  Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[6]  Andrzej Krol,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and radiation dose as a function of photon energy in mammography , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[7]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Development of an anthropomorphic breast phantom. , 1990, Medical physics.

[8]  J M Boone.  Parametrized x-ray absorption in diagnostic radiology from Monte Carlo calculations: implications for x-ray detector design. , 1992, Medical physics.

[9]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Niobium/molybdenum K-edge filtration in mammography: contrast and dose evaluation. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  S Muller,et al.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Tong Xu,et al.  Area beam equalization: optimization and performance of an automated prototype system for chest radiography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[12]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Scatter-glare estimation for digital radiographic systems: comparison of digital filtration and sampling techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  S C Lillicrap,et al.  Optimum x-ray spectra for mammography. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R G Zamenhof,et al.  The optimization of signal detectability in digital fluoroscopy. , 1982, Medical physics.

[15]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Scatter-glare corrections in quantitative dual-energy fluoroscopy. , 1988, Medical physics.

[16]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[17]  B. Munier,et al.  Full field digital mammography scanner. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[18]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography. , 1998, Medical physics.

[19]  T Mather,et al.  Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[20]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose. , 2003, Medical physics.

[22]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[23]  S Molloi,et al.  X-ray beam equalization: feasibility and performance of an automated prototype system in a phantom and swine. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  Kent M. Ogden,et al.  General approach to optimizing digital mammography with respect to radiation risk , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[25]  D B Plewes,et al.  Observer performance and dose efficiency of mammographic scanning equalization radiography. , 1993, Medical physics.

[26]  R Fahrig,et al.  Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type. , 1994, Medical physics.

[27]  D B Plewes,et al.  Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[28]  R. J. Eastgate,et al.  Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[29]  M Danos,et al.  Image information content and patient exposure. , 1978, Medical physics.

[30]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. , 2003, Radiology.

[31]  W. Sobol,et al.  Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables. , 1997, Medical physics.

[32]  Walter Huda,et al.  Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[33]  R Speller,et al.  A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  R Fahrig,et al.  Dynamic range requirements in digital mammography. , 1993, Medical physics.

[35]  H P Chan,et al.  Design and evaluation of an external filter technique for exposure equalization in mammography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[36]  H Bernstein,et al.  An approach to specifying a minimum dose system for mammography using multiparameter optimization techniques. , 1985, Medical physics.

[37]  D B Plewes,et al.  Mammographic scanning equalization radiography. , 1993, Medical physics.

[38]  K L Lam,et al.  Effects of x-ray beam equalization on mammographic imaging. , 1990, Medical physics.