When in doubt follow your nose—a wayfinding strategy

Route selection is governed by various strategies which often allow minimizing the required memory capacity. Previous research showed that navigators primarily remember information at route decision points and at route turns, rather than at intersections which required straight walking. However, when actually navigating the route or indicating directional decisions, navigators make fewer errors when they are required to walk straight. This tradeoff between location memory and route decisions accuracy was interpreted as a “when in doubt follow your nose” strategy which allows navigators to only memorize turns and walk straight by default, thus considerably reducing the number of intersections to memorize. These findings were based on newly learned routes. In the present study, we show that such an asymmetry in route memory also prevails for planning routes within highly familiar environments. Participants planned route sequences between locations in their city of residency by pressing arrow keys on a keyboard. They tended to ignore straight walking intersections, but they ignored turns much less so. However, for reported intersections participants were quicker at indicating straight walking than turning. Together with results described in the literature, these findings suggest that a “when in doubt follow your nose strategy” is applied also within highly familiar spaces and might originate from limited working memory capacity during planning a route.

[1]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Learning to navigate: Experience versus maps , 2013, Cognition.

[2]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report , 1995, COSIT.

[3]  D. Norman Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[4]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  The Network of Reference Frames Theory: A Synthesis of Graphs and Cognitive Maps , 2008, Spatial Cognition.

[5]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Embodied spatial cognition: Biological and artificial systems , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Sholl Mj Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987 .

[7]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[8]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Pictorial Representations of Routes: Chunking Route Segments during Comprehension , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[9]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Acquisition of Landmark Knowledge from Static and Dynamic Presentation of Route Maps , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[10]  N. Christenfeld Choices from Identical Options , 1995 .

[11]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Two strategies for learning a route in a driving simulator. , 1997 .

[13]  T. Tenbrink,et al.  Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning , 2011, Cognition.

[14]  M. Jeanne Sholl,et al.  Egocentric frames of reference used for the retrieval of survey knowledge learned by map and navigation , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[15]  R. Dalton The Secret Is To Follow Your Nose , 2001 .

[16]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Navigating through a virtual city: Using virtual reality technology to study human action and perception , 1998, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  J N Bailenson,et al.  The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  Why Buildings Are Known , 1969 .

[20]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  Hierarchical Representations of Indoor Spaces , 2011 .

[21]  Martin Raubal,et al.  A Formal Model of the Process of Wayfinding in Built Environments , 1999, COSIT.

[22]  T. SHALLICE,et al.  Learning and Memory , 1970, Nature.

[23]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  'Fine-to-Coarse' Route Planning and Navigation in Regionalized Environments , 2003, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[24]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  From Isovists via Mental Representations to Behaviour: First Steps toward Closing the Causal Chain , 2007 .

[25]  R. Cohen,et al.  The Representation of Landmarks and Routes. , 1980 .

[26]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  BIOLOGICALLY BASED ARTIFICIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS: REVIEW AND PROSPECTS , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[27]  M. Sholl Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Is the Map in Our Head Oriented North? , 2012, Psychological science.

[29]  B. Poucet Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. , 1993, Psychological review.

[30]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  From Cognitive Maps to Cognitive Graphs , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  A Model for Context-Specific Route Directions , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[32]  Bernd Krieg-Brückner,et al.  Modelling Navigational Knowledge by Route Graphs , 2000, Spatial Cognition.

[33]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach , 2009, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[34]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Use and interaction of navigation strategies in regionalized environments , 2004 .

[35]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .