Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia

[1]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Impact Factor : tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact , 2014 .

[2]  Richard A. Wanner,et al.  Research Productivity in Academia: A Comparative Study of the Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities. , 1981 .

[3]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1996 .

[4]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2010, Scientometrics.

[5]  Trevor I. Fenner,et al.  Characterisation of the $$\chi$$ χ -index and the rec-index , 2019, Scientometrics.

[6]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study , 2013, Scientometrics.

[7]  Theodore Brown,et al.  Predicting citation patterns: defining and determining influence , 2016, Scientometrics.

[8]  Weimao Ke.  A fitness model for scholarly impact analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[9]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[10]  P. Carroll,et al.  Gender differences in academic productivity and academic career choice among urology residents. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Gregory D. Webster,et al.  Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979 – 2008 , 2009 .

[14]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Reputation and impact in academic careers , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Fenner,et al.  A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation , 2018, PloS one.

[16]  John Mingers,et al.  Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management , 2010, Scientometrics.

[17]  Réjean Landry,et al.  An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity , 1996 .

[18]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison , 2015, Scientometrics.

[19]  J. Eloy,et al.  Gender Disparities in Scholarly Productivity within Academic Otolaryngology Departments , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[20]  Lorna Elizabeth Wildgaard,et al.  A comparison of 17 author-level bibliometric indicators for researchers in Astronomy, Environmental Science, Philosophy and Public Health in Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2015, Scientometrics.

[21]  Jens Peter Andersen,et al.  Google Scholar and Web of Science: Examining gender differences in citation coverage across five scientific disciplines , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Lorenzo Ductor.  Does Co‐Authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity? , 2015 .

[23]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Rickard Danell,et al.  Early career performance and its correlation with gender and publication output during doctoral education , 2019, Scientometrics.

[25]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[26]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[27]  Chris Rensleigh,et al.  Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison , 2013, Electron. Libr..

[28]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.

[29]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.

[30]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[31]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[32]  Elaine Lasda Bergman,et al.  Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar , 2012 .

[33]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the Literature , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[34]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system , 2009, Scientometrics.

[35]  K. Freund,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Differences in Academic Productivity Among Medical Faculty Across 24 Medical Schools in the United States , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[37]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science , 2012, Scientometrics.

[38]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[39]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[40]  Nadia Simoes,et al.  A flexible approach for measuring author-level publishing performance , 2019, Scientometrics.

[41]  Theodore Leng,et al.  Medical school and residency influence on choice of an academic career and academic productivity among neurosurgery faculty in the United States. Clinical article. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[42]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[43]  Darcy A Reed,et al.  Gender Differences in Academic Productivity and Leadership Appointments of Physicians Throughout Academic Careers , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[44]  Susanne Mikki,et al.  Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences , 2010, Scientometrics.

[45]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data , 2016 .

[46]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[47]  Meghna Sabharwal,et al.  Comparing Research Productivity Across Disciplines and Career Stages , 2013 .

[48]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? , 2009, ArXiv.

[50]  S. D. De Groote,et al.  Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. , 2012, Nursing outlook.

[51]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[52]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , 2016, Science.

[53]  Martin Trow,et al.  Research Activity in American Higher Education. , 1974 .

[54]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning , 1990 .

[55]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Research Note: Correlates of Faculty Publications. , 1978 .

[56]  Steven Stack,et al.  Gender, Children and Research Productivity , 2004 .

[57]  P. Pagel,et al.  An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[58]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[59]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[60]  Nitza Davidovitch,et al.  The law of limited excellence: publication productivity of Israel Prize laureates in the life and exact sciences , 2017, Scientometrics.

[61]  Mickaël Coustaty,et al.  Scientometric analysis of social science and science disciplines in a developing nation: a case study of Pakistan in the last decade , 2020, Scientometrics.

[62]  J. Eloy,et al.  A gender-based comparison of academic rank and scholarly productivity in academic neurological surgery , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[63]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[64]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors , 2016, ArXiv.

[65]  W. Haverkamp,et al.  The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar , 2019, ESC heart failure.

[66]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Local, Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[67]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  The inconsistency of the h-index , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[68]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.