Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] The effect of discrimination training on the response rate and response duration of the rat , 1977 .
[2] H. Leitenberg,et al. “Time-out from positive reinforcement” as the UCS in a CER paradigm with rats , 1968 .
[3] N. Azrin,et al. Positive conditioned suppression: conditioned suppression using positive reinforcers as the unconditioned stimuli. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] James R. Sutterer,et al. POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN THE RAT1 , 1975 .
[5] W. Henton,et al. Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning , 1978 .
[6] G. Woodruff. Behavioral contrast and type of reward: Role of elicited response topography , 1979 .
[7] C. N. Uhl,et al. Omission training compared with yoked controls and extinction in multiple-schedule discrimination learning , 1974 .
[8] J. Kagel,et al. Substitutability in time allocation. , 1980 .
[9] C. Shimp. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[10] B A Williams. Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[11] R D Spealman,et al. Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] J C Todorov,et al. Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[13] W. Merigan,et al. Short-component multiple schedules: effects of relative reinforcement duration. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[14] Barry Schwartz. Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] C. C. Perkins,et al. The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[16] J. Staddon,et al. The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .
[17] B. Schwartz. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon depends upon the location of the stimulus , 1974 .
[18] D M Wilkie,et al. Signalled reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[19] F. Mcsweeney. Differences between rates of responding emitted during simple and multiple schedules , 1980 .
[20] J. Staddon,et al. Contrast effects in maintained generalization gradients. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[21] William M. Baum,et al. BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST OF TIME ALLOCATION1 , 1976 .
[22] John A. Nevin,et al. RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1 , 1974 .
[23] B A Williams,et al. The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] H. Rachlin. Contrast and Matching. , 1973 .
[25] B. Freeman,et al. Behavioral contrast: Reinforcement frequency or response suppression? , 1971 .
[26] E. Hearst,et al. Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[27] Dale M. Brethower,et al. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[28] R J Herrnstein,et al. Hunger and contrast in a multiple schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[29] Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[30] A molecular analysis of multiple schedule interactions: negative contrast. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[31] R. J. Irwin,et al. Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[32] K G White,et al. Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[33] D L Myers,et al. Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[34] R. Wilton,et al. Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[35] J. Staddon. Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. , 1979 .
[36] R. Herrnstein. On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[37] T. Bloomfield. Behavioral contrast and relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[38] B. Hamilton,et al. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[39] L R Gollub,et al. Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[40] Operant and Pavlovian factors in cross-response transfer of inhibitory stimulus control , 1978 .
[41] B. Schwartz. Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[42] G S REYNOLDS,et al. Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[43] T. Bloomfield. Two types of behavioral contrast in discrimination learning. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[44] Howard Rachlin,et al. Economic and biological influences on a pigeon's key peck. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[45] J A Nevin,et al. On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[46] N. Mackintosh,et al. Some determinants of behavioral contrast in pigeons and rats , 1972 .
[47] M. Rilling,et al. Procedural antecedents of behavioral contrast: a re-examination of errorless learning. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[48] W M Baum,et al. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[49] A. Catania,et al. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[50] B. Williams. The role of local interactions in behavioral contrast , 1974 .
[51] B. Schwartz. Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[52] J. Farley,et al. Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[53] J. Farley. Automaintenance, contrast, and contingencies: Effects of local vs. overall and prior vs. impending reinforcement context , 1980 .
[54] P. Blough. Behavioral and dimensional contrast in rats. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[55] M Davison,et al. The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[56] Rates of responding in the pigeon generated by simple and complex schedules which provide the same rates of reinforcement , 1976 .
[57] J. Nevin. Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[58] C. Flaherty,et al. Anticipation of incentive gain , 1982 .
[59] J. Gibbon. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .
[60] B. Schwartz,et al. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[61] E. L. Edmon. Multiple schedule component duration: a reanalysis of Shimp and Wheatley (1971) and Todorov (1972). , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[62] G E Zuriff. A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[63] A. Silberberg,et al. The Structure of Choice , 1978 .
[64] D M Wilkie,et al. Variable-time reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[65] David R. Thomas,et al. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization: II. Within-subjects design , 1967 .
[66] A. Charles Catania,et al. Inhibition and behavioral contrast , 1964 .
[67] A. V. Bacotti. Home cage feeding time controls responding under multiple schedules , 1976 .
[68] J E Staddon,et al. On Herrnstein's equation and related forms. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[69] R. Beninger,et al. Behavioral contrast in rats with different reinforcers and different response topographies. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[70] A. Padilla. Analysis of incentive and behavioral contrast in the rat. , 1971 .
[71] C. Bradshaw,et al. Behaviour of Rats in Multiple Schedules of Response-Contingent and Response-Independent Food Presentation , 1978 .
[72] R. Herrnstein,et al. Toward a law of response strength. , 1976 .
[73] R. Hamm,et al. Differential conditioning of conditioned enhancement and positive conditioned suppression , 1978 .
[74] K G White,et al. Undermatching and contrast within components of multiple schedules. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[75] C. Rovee-Collier,et al. Positive behavioral contrast in 3-month-old infants on multiple conjugate reinforcement schedules. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[76] R N Wilton,et al. Behavioral contrast as a function of the duration of an immediately preceding period of extinction. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[77] H S Terrace,et al. Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[78] D. Stewart,et al. Line-orientation generalization following signalled-reinforcer training. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[79] S. Pliskoff. RATE-CHANGE EFFECTS WITH EQUAL POTENTIAL REINFORCEMENTS DURING THE "WARNING" STIMULUS. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[80] E. Hearst,et al. Some tests of the additivity (autoshaping) theory of behavioral contrast , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.
[81] M. Rilling,et al. Comparison of time-out and extinction as determinants of behavioral contrast: An analysis of sequential effects , 1972 .
[82] J. Allison. Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[83] J. Malone. Local contrast and Pavlovian induction. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[84] M. Davison,et al. On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[85] K L Wheatley,et al. Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[86] R. Boakes,et al. Successive discrimination training with equated reinforcement frequencies: failure to obtain behavioral contrast. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[87] Positive behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles during multiple schedules. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[88] J A Nevin,et al. An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[89] P. D. Villiers,et al. Toward a quantitative theory of punishment. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[90] F. Mcsweeney. Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[91] B. Williams,et al. Determinants of contrast in the signal-key procedure: Evidence against additivity theory. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[92] Behavioral contrast without response-rate reduction. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[93] D. Meltzer,et al. Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[94] Signalled reinforcement and multiple schedules. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[95] W. Baum,et al. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[96] S. Sadowsky. Behavioral contrast with timeout, blackout, or extinction as the negative condition. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[97] A. Kaufman. Response suppression in the CER paradigm with extinction as the aversive event , 1969 .
[98] R. Weisman. Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[99] A. Catania,et al. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[100] R. F. Westbrook. Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[101] H. Leitenberg,et al. Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[102] C. A. Boneau,et al. Work decrement and reminiscence in pigeon operant responding. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.
[103] Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[104] J. Hinson,et al. Behavioral competition: a mechanism for schedule interactions. , 1978, Science.
[105] E Fantino,et al. The symmetrical law of effect and the matching relation in choice behavior. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[106] Positive contrast in the rat: a test of the additivity theory. , 1979, The American journal of psychology.
[107] B. Williams. Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[108] K. Keller. The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[109] The role of response-independent reinforcement in producing behavioral contrast effects in the rat , 1971 .
[110] D. Wilkie. Behavioral contrast produced by a signaled decrease in local rate of reinforcement , 1977 .
[111] B. Williams. Behavioral contrast as a function of the temporal location of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[112] Behavioral contrast in pigeons learning an auditory discrimination , 1975 .
[113] Ronald G. Hughes,et al. The role of response suppression in behavioral contrast: Signaled reinforcement , 1970 .
[114] B. Williams. Contrast, Signaled Reinforcement, and the Relative Law of Effect , 1980 .
[115] F K McSweeney,et al. Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[116] W. Selekman. Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[117] A. Gutman. Positive contrast, negative induction, and inhibitory stimulus control in the rat. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[118] D. Fenner. The role of contingencies and "principles of behavioral variation" in pigeons' pecking. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[119] J. Malone,et al. Multiple-schedule interactions and discrimination , 1981 .
[120] S PLISKOFF,et al. Rate-change effects during a pre-schedule-change stimulus. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[121] J. Hinson,et al. Effects of component length and of the transitions among components in multiple schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[122] M C Davison,et al. Multiple and concurrent schedule performance: independence from concurrent and successive schedule contexts. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[123] B A Williams,et al. A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.