Management strategies and results for severely encrusted retained ureteral stents.

PURPOSE To review the management approach to and results of severely encrusted retained ureteral stents and analyze predictive risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records from January 1996 to March 2006 were reviewed for Double-J stent complications and their final outcome. A total of 876 stents were inserted in 784 patients for treatment of renal calculi with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteral calculi, after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, pyeloplasty, or injury to the ureter and kidney. Of these stents, 95 (10.84%) were found to be encrusted, and 26 (2.96%) were not only encrusted but retained as well. These patients, 21 men and 5 women with a mean age of 34 years (range 18-69 years), underwent one or more of the following procedures: cystolitholapaxy, retrograde ureteroscopic manipulation, intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and open surgical removal to make them stent free. RESULTS The average duration of stent placement was 14 months (range 5 months-9 years). The encrustation was confined to the upper coil in 4 and the upper coil and body in 5. The lower coil and body in 8 and 9, respectively, were totally encrusted, of which 2 were fragmented as well. A total of 62 sessions of auxiliary procedures were required to render patients stent free. Four patients required percutaneous nephrolithotomy and one open removal. CONCLUSION Encrustation and retention of a ureteral stent is a serious complication. Successful management of encrusted retained stents requires multimodality procedures along with proper record keeping of stent insertion and removal and patient counseling.

[1]  H. Mardis,et al.  Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents. , 1993, Journal of endourology.

[2]  C. Yeniyol,et al.  Bacterial colonization of double J stents and bacteriuria frequency , 2002, International Urology and Nephrology.

[3]  A. Boularan,et al.  Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. , 1997, Urologia internationalis.

[4]  G. Oldani,et al.  Encrustation and stone formation: complication of indwelling ureteral stents. , 1985, Urology.

[5]  Finney Rp Double-J and diversion stents. , 1982 .

[6]  D. Tolley,et al.  Endourological management of severely encrusted ureteral stents. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[7]  C. Kane,et al.  Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Zerbib,et al.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy to remove calcified ureteral stents. , 1990, Urology.

[9]  I Husain,et al.  Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[10]  M. Gleave,et al.  Is the flare phenomenon clinically significant? Commentary , 2001 .

[11]  M. Helal,et al.  The overlooked, retained Double J stent. , 1990, Urology.

[12]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. , 2003, Urology.

[13]  J. Seigne,et al.  1-step removal of encrusted retained ureteral stents. , 2003, The Journal of urology.