Personality trait scores among occupationally active bullied persons and witnesses to bullying

There is little research on the personalities and emotional stability of persons who report being bullied or witnessing bullying at work. Men and women (N = 247) from 19 to 64 years of age and in manual labour completed a questionnaire concerning the psychosocial work climate, bullying and personality. Three groups were defined: bullied (N = 14), witnesses (N = 31) and non-bullied respondents (N = 202). The Swedish universities Scale of Personality was used to assess personality traits related to the three major dimensions of neuroticism, extraversion, and aggressiveness. Bullied persons had higher scores on all six scales within the neuroticism dimension as well as higher irritability (aggressiveness dimension) and impulsiveness scores (extraversion dimension), when compared with their non-bullied work colleagues. To conclude, bullied persons display a self-image that is dominated by mistrust and embitterment as well as irritability and impulsiveness. Accordingly, when dealing with bullying at work, the need for ego-supportive actions should be considered in conjunction with more organisational, collective oriented action.

[1]  Erling Roland,et al.  Aggression, depression, and bullying others , 2002 .

[2]  H Bergman,et al.  Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[3]  D G Altman,et al.  Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons , 1995, BMJ.

[4]  Paul D. Williams,et al.  A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire , 1988 .

[5]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach , 1985 .

[6]  Thompson E. Davis,et al.  Anxiety Disorders and Phobias , 2010 .

[7]  I. Coyne,et al.  PERSONALITY TRAITS OF BULLIES AS A CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR IN WORKPLACE BULLYING: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY , 2007 .

[8]  N. Tinbergen,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[9]  A. Rodríguez-Muñoz,et al.  THE MODERATING ROLE OF ASSERTIVENESS AND SOCIAL ANXIETY IN WORKPLACE BULLYING: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES , 2007 .

[10]  Stig Berge Matthiesen,et al.  Helsemessige aspekter ved mobbing i arbeidslivet: Modererende effekter av sosial støtte og personlighet , 1996 .

[11]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  Aggression among university employees , 1994 .

[12]  S. Einarsen,et al.  Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: the role of state negative affectivity and generalized self-efficacy. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[13]  I. Coyne,et al.  Predicting workplace victim status from personality , 2000 .

[14]  Mobbing i arbeidslivet: Utbredelse—ytringsformer—konsekvenser , 1990 .

[15]  P. Girardi,et al.  Personality and Psychopathological Profiles in Individuals Exposed to Mobbing , 2007, Violence and Victims.

[16]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[17]  N. Kawakami,et al.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[18]  Roger Persson,et al.  Bullying at work, health outcomes, and physiological stress response. , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[19]  N. Djurkovic,et al.  Neuroticism and the psychosomatic model of workplace bullying , 2006 .

[20]  Peter Randall,et al.  Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences, and perceptions of the working environment , 2003 .

[21]  H. Fishbein,et al.  The Influence of Personality on Workplace Bullying and Discrimination , 2006 .

[22]  Robert McMurrian,et al.  Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. , 1996 .

[23]  S. Einarsen,et al.  Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study , 2007 .

[24]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression , 1992 .

[25]  M. Åsberg,et al.  Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology: Temperament traits associated with platelet MAO activity , 1987, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[26]  Jay Schulkin,et al.  A Cognitive Perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Morten Birkeland Nielsen,et al.  Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? , 2007, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[28]  A. Beck,et al.  Anxiety disorders and phobias : a cognitive perspective , 2005 .

[29]  M. Marmot,et al.  Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health? A comparative study of Finland, Japan, and the UK. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[30]  S. B. Matthiesen,et al.  MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work , 2001 .

[31]  S. Einarsen.  Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the scandinavian approach , 2000 .

[32]  R Gandolfo,et al.  MMPI-2 profiles of worker's compensation claimants who present with complaints of harassment. , 1995, Journal of clinical psychology.

[33]  Kerstina Ohlsson,et al.  Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: exposure and musculoskeletal disorders , 2008, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[34]  T. Rammsayer,et al.  Grundlegende Persönlichkeitsmerkmale und individuelle Stressverarbeitungsstrategien als Determinanten der Mobbing-Betroffenheit , 2006 .