Environmental conditions for the safeguarding of collections: A background to the current debate on the control of relative humidity and temperature

AbstractConditions of relative humidity (RH) and temperature within museums and buildings holding collections of cultural heritage objects are often maintained around a strictly controlled set point of about 50 ± 5% RH and 20 or 21 ± 2°C to provide safe, stable conditions for hygroscopic artifacts. It has recently been proposed that these ranges should be relaxed to values that are less energy-intensive to maintain while still being safe for the objects in the collection, with the aim of reducing both carbon footprint and energy use. It is also suggested that conditions should be determined by the needs of individual objects and by the local climate of the region, rather than applying overall values across the museum as a whole. This proposal has led to much discussion within the conservation community. The suggested values, a stable humidity within the range 40–60% RH and a stable temperature within the range 16–25°C for most objects, apart from the most vulnerable, are derived from the results of experi...

[1]  David Erhardt,et al.  Structural response of painted wood surfaces to changes in ambient relative humidity , 1998 .

[2]  SS GREAT BRITAIN: CONSERVATION AND ACCESS – SYNERGY AND COST , 2008 .

[3]  M. Strlič,et al.  Safe display parameters for veneer and marquetry objects: A review of the available information for wooden collections , 2013 .

[4]  Mattias Legnér,et al.  On the Early History of Museum Environment Control - Nationalmuseum and Gripsholm Castle in Sweden, c.1866-1932 , 2011 .

[5]  Lars Klemm Passively conditioned zero-energy storage for cultural properties and archival material , 2013 .

[6]  Kazuko Hioki From Japanese Tradition: Is Kura a Model for a Sustainable Preservation Environment? , 2007 .

[7]  A. Schulze How the usual museum climate recommendations endanger our cultural heritage , 2013 .

[8]  Simon Lambert The Early History of Preventive Conservation in Great Britain and the United States (1850–1950) , 2014 .

[9]  Christina Young,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of adhesives and gap fillers for re-joining panel paintings , 2002 .

[10]  Marion F. Mecklenburg,et al.  INVESTIGATION INTO THE DETERIORATION OF PAINTINGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS USING COMPUTERIZED MODELING OF STRESS DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[11]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AIR-CONDITIONED AND NON AIR-CONDITIONED MUSEUMS , 1994 .

[12]  Nigel Blades,et al.  Analysing the energy consumption of conservation heating systems at the National Trust , 2011 .

[13]  Tim Padfield,et al.  A museum storage facility controlled by solar energy , 2013 .

[14]  D. Saunders Climate Change and Museum Collections , 2008 .

[15]  Stefan Michalski,et al.  Relative humidity: a discussion of correct/incorrect values , 1993 .

[16]  D Thickett,et al.  Applying Preventive Conservation Recommendations for Silk in Historic Houses , 2010 .

[17]  Garry Thomson,et al.  The museum environment , 1979 .

[18]  Colin Forno,et al.  Moiré fringe analysis of cradled panel paintings , 1997 .

[19]  Andreas Burmester,et al.  Learning from history. Historic indoor climate conditions and climate control strategies , 2013 .

[20]  J. Ashley-Smith,et al.  Let's be honest — realistic environmental parameters for loaned objects , 1994 .

[21]  Łukasz Bratasz,et al.  Impact of Indoor Heating on Painted Wood - Monitoring the Altarpiece in the Church of Santa Maria Maddalena in Rocca Pietore, Italy , 2007 .

[22]  Łukasz Bratasz,et al.  Allowable microclimatic variations for painted wood , 2013 .

[23]  Stefan Michalski,et al.  Double the life for each five-degree drop, more than double the life for each halving of relative humidity , 2002 .

[24]  Robert Waller,et al.  Conservation risk assessment: a strategy for managing resources for preventive conservation , 1994 .

[25]  Stefan Michalski,et al.  The Ideal Climate, Risk Management, the ASHRAE Chapter, Proofed Fluctuations, and Toward a Full Risk Analysis Model , 2007 .

[26]  Dario Camuffo,et al.  The conservation of artworks and hot air heating systems in churches: are they compatible? the case of rocca pietore, italian alps , 1999 .

[27]  T Padfield,et al.  How to Design Museums with a Naturally Stable Climate , 2004 .

[28]  S Staniforth Relative humidity as an agent of deterioration , 2006 .

[29]  Marion F. Mecklenburg,et al.  Relative humidity re-examined , 1994 .

[30]  Lieve Watteeuw,et al.  PAS 198:2012 Specification for managing environmental conditions for cultural collections , 2012 .

[31]  Sarah Staniforth,et al.  Appropriate technologies for relative humidity control for museum collections housed in historic buildings , 1994 .

[32]  Marion F. Mecklenburg,et al.  Applying Science to the Question of Museum Climate , 2007 .

[33]  Marion F. Mecklenburg,et al.  Determining the Acceptable Ranges of Relative Humidity And Temperature in Museums and Galleries: Part 1, Structural Response to Relative Humidity , 2007 .

[34]  M. Mecklenburg,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Paintings Subjected to Changes in Temperature and Relative Humidity , 1991 .

[36]  W. Erhardt,et al.  Accelerated VS Natural Aging: Effect of Aging Conditions on the Aging Process of Cellulose , 1995 .

[37]  Marion F. Mecklenburg,et al.  Determining the Acceptable Ranges of Relative Humidity and Temperature in Museums and Galleries, Part 2, Structural Response to Temperature , 2007 .

[38]  Richard L. Kerschner A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COLLECTIONS IN HISTORIC BUILDINGS , 1992 .