Systematic Literature Review of Students’ Affective Responses to Active Learning: Overview of Results

This full “research” paper presents an overview of results of a systematic literature review of students' affective responses to active learning in undergraduate STEM courses. We considered 2,364 abstracts of conference papers and journal articles published since 1990, and 412 studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies span the STEM disciplines and report various types of active learning. Their research designs include primarily quantitative methods (especially instructor-designed surveys and course evaluations), and they find that students’ affective responses are overwhelmingly positive. Few studies excelled on our quality score metric, and there few statistically significant differences by discipline (but biology studies and chemistry studies scored significantly higher in quality than electrical engineering studies). We include several possible directions for future work.

[1]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[2]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics , 2007 .

[3]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Factors that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering , 2013 .

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Students’ expectations, types of instruction, and instructor strategies predicting student response to active learning , 2017 .

[6]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[7]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments , 2010 .

[8]  Ross H. Nehm,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, by Susan R.Singer, Natalie R.Nielsen, and Heidi A.Schweingruber (Eds.). National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. xi + 264 pp. ISBN 978-0-309-25411-3. , 2014 .

[9]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[10]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study , 2013 .

[11]  D. Gough,et al.  An Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2017 .

[12]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Strategies for Instructors , 2018 .

[13]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Board 28: Work in Progress: How Do Students Respond to Active Learning? A Coding Guide for a Systematic Review of the Literature , 2018 .

[14]  Katherine A. Friedrich,et al.  9: Thawing the Chilly Climate: Inclusive Teaching Resources for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math , 2008 .

[15]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses. , 2013 .

[16]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Instructional Systems of Practice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Math and Science Undergraduate Course Planning and Classroom Teaching , 2013 .

[17]  N Mays,et al.  Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research , 1995 .

[18]  David Moher,et al.  The art and science of knowledge synthesis. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  C. Hansel Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[20]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Estimates of Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[21]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning , 2018, International Journal of STEM Education.

[22]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Findings from classroom observations of 58 math and science faculty , 2012 .