A three dimensional tracking scheme for underwater non-cooperative objects in mixed LOS and NLOS environment

Underwater positioning and tracking scheme for non-cooperative objects is of great essence to explore unknown fields. Due to the high response time and non-line-of-sight(NLOS) propagation in the underwater acoustic sensor networks (UASNs), the existed range-based 3D target tracking algorithms are generally inaccurate on detecting underwater non-cooperative objects. In order to solve the problems above, the corresponding solutions are presented respectively in this paper. Although it is hard to change the inherent property of the underwater acoustic propagation, reducing the communication time is another way to solve the problem indirectly. Since the ranging phase and synchronize phase occupy most of the communication time, the presented novel ranging scheme for non-cooperative objects reduces the redundant time consumption, and further eliminates the necessity of synchronization process in advanced. For NLOS propagation, a distributed residual weighting discrimination (DRWD) algorithm based on grouping strategy is proposed for non-cooperative objects. The position estimations of the groups containing the NLOS link error are always distributed in isolation, and the estimations without the NLOS link errors are always concentrated in a small range. According to this feature, a low computational complexity approach namely two-step least square (LS) is proposed to determine the best location by analyzing the distribution of estimated coordinates. Meanwhile, a parameterized selection strategy is proposed first time to evaluate the construction of reference nodes in 3D target tracking. We provide a mathematical proof for our strategy, which avoids the ambiguity occurrence caused by the distribution of reference nodes. The new scheme provided for underwater acoustic tracking (UWAT) greatly improves the positioning accuracy in mixed LOS/NLOS environment. At the end of the paper, simulations are illustrated to evaluate and validate the algorithmic superiority and effectiveness.

[1]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[2]  Shengli Zhou,et al.  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (TO APPEAR) 1 Stratification Effect Compensation for Improved Underwater Acoustic Ranging , 2022 .

[3]  Winston Khoon Guan Seah,et al.  Localization in underwater sensor networks: survey and challenges , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[4]  Geert Leus,et al.  Target Localization and Tracking for an Isogradient Sound Speed Profile , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Mari Carmen Domingo,et al.  Overview of channel models for underwater wireless communication networks , 2008, Phys. Commun..

[6]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  Scalable Localization with Mobility Prediction for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[7]  R.L. Moses,et al.  Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  Xin-Ping Guan,et al.  A distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm with improved coverage in wireless sensor networks , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[9]  Pi-Chun Chen,et al.  A non-line-of-sight error mitigation algorithm in location estimation , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[10]  Yu Wang,et al.  Secrecy Transmission for Femtocell Networks Against External Eavesdropper , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies , 2013, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[12]  Hao Zhou,et al.  On-demand asynchronous localization for underwater sensor networks , 2012 .

[13]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Underwater Target Tracking With Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  Paolo Braca,et al.  Bayesian Tracking in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks With Port-Starboard Ambiguity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Y. Jay Guo,et al.  Statistical NLOS Identification Based on AOA, TOA, and Signal Strength , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Yuanqing Xia,et al.  Power Allocation Robust to Time-Varying Wireless Channels in Femtocell Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  TOA-Based Robust Wireless Geolocation and Cramér-Rao Lower Bound Analysis in Harsh LOS/NLOS Environments , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[19]  Shuai Chang,et al.  Color Filtering Localization for Three-Dimensional Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2015, Sensors.

[20]  Hwee-Pink Tan,et al.  NLOS identification using a hybrid ToA-signal strength algorithm for underwater acoustic localization , 2010, OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE.

[21]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Cooperative Received Signal Strength-Based Sensor Localization With Unknown Transmit Powers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Communications and Networking: Recent Advances and Future Challenges , 2008 .

[23]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  A Survey of Architectures and Localization Techniques for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Xiuzhen Cheng,et al.  Silent Positioning in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[25]  Ulrich Hammes,et al.  Robust Mobile Terminal Tracking in NLOS Environments Based on Data Association , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[26]  Timothy K. Shih,et al.  Survey on underwater delay/disruption tolerant wireless sensor network routing , 2014 .

[27]  Wenyu Liu,et al.  Indoor Localization Based on Curve Fitting and Location Search Using Received Signal Strength , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[28]  Hwee Pink Tan,et al.  LOS and NLOS Classification for Underwater Acoustic Localization , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[29]  Anthony Man-Cho So,et al.  Robust Convex Approximation Methods for TDOA-Based Localization Under NLOS Conditions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[30]  Wenyu Liu,et al.  Localization and Synchronization for 3D Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2007, UIC.

[31]  Haibin Yu,et al.  Target tracking based on a distributed particle filter in underwater sensor networks , 2008 .