Envelope Coding and Processing: Implications for Perception and Behavior

How envelopes are processed in the electrosensory system and how this gives rise to behavioral responses has been the focus of extensive research. This chapter provides a comprehensive review on the mechanisms the brain exploits at different stages of sensory processing to extract meaningful information about these stimulus attributes and how this mediates behavioral responses. After a brief review of the relevant anatomy and circuitry, the natural statistics of envelopes in the electrosensory system are discussed in detail. This is followed by a review of the current state of knowledge as to the cellular and network mechanisms that give rise to envelope responses in the electrosensory system. In particular, it is highlighted how electrosensory neurons can optimally encode envelopes by matching their tuning properties to natural statistics. There is an emphasis throughout the chapter on the important parallels with the mammalian auditory and other systems, along with interesting future avenues of research.

[1]  André Longtin,et al.  Coding Conspecific Identity and Motion in the Electric Sense , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Neural correlations enable invariant coding and perception of natural stimuli in weakly electric fish , 2016, eLife.

[3]  J. Bastian,et al.  Dendritic modulation of burst-like firing in sensory neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Electrosensory processing in Apteronotus albifrons: implications for general and specific neural coding strategies across wave-type weakly electric fish species. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[6]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  Feedback optimizes neural coding and perception of natural stimuli , 2018, eLife.

[7]  Maurice J. Chacron,et al.  Weakly electric fish distinguish between envelope stimuli arising from different behavioral contexts , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Mohsen Jamali,et al.  Coding of envelopes by correlated but not single-neuron activity requires neural variability , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  André Longtin,et al.  Neural dynamics of envelope coding. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[11]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[12]  André Longtin,et al.  Contrast coding in the electrosensory system: parallels with visual computation , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Rüdiger Krahe,et al.  Species differences in group size and electrosensory interference in weakly electric fishes: Implications for electrosensory processing , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  R. Meddis,et al.  A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Leonard Maler,et al.  SK Channels Provide a Novel Mechanism for the Control of Frequency Tuning in Electrosensory Neurons , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  L. Maler,et al.  Limits of linear rate coding of dynamic stimuli by electroreceptor afferents. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[18]  D Kleinfeld,et al.  Central versus peripheral determinants of patterned spike activity in rat vibrissa cortex during whisking. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C. Carr,et al.  Timing is everything: Organization of timing circuits in auditory and electrical sensory systems , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient coding of natural sounds , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  C E Carr,et al.  Laminar organization of the afferent and efferent systems of the torus semicircularis of Gymnotiform fish: Morphological substrates for parallel processing in the electrosensory system , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  The neural basis of a sensory filter in the Jamming Avoidance Response: No grandmother cells in sight , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  J. Bastian,et al.  Commissural neurons of the electrosensory lateral line lobe of Apteronotus leptorhynchus: morphological and physiological characteristics , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  M. Chacron,et al.  Neural heterogeneities influence envelope and temporal coding at the sensory periphery , 2011, Neuroscience.

[25]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Stimulus background influences phase invariant coding by correlated neural activity , 2017, eLife.

[26]  André Longtin,et al.  Cellular and circuit properties supporting different sensory coding strategies in electric fish and other systems , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  M B Sachs,et al.  Transformation of temporal discharge patterns in a ventral cochlear nucleus stellate cell model: implications for physiological mechanisms. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[29]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  A. Watanabe,et al.  The Change of Discharge Frequency by A.C. Stimulus in a Weak Electric Fish , 1963 .

[31]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Peter Heil,et al.  Coding of temporal onset envelope in the auditory system , 2003, Speech Commun..

[33]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Sparse and dense coding of natural stimuli by distinct midbrain neuron subpopulations in weakly electric fish. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Zhubo D. Zhang,et al.  Adaptation to second order stimulus features by electrosensory neurons causes ambiguity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Weakly electric fish display behavioral responses to envelopes naturally occurring during movement: implications for neural processing , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Differential distribution of SK channel subtypes in the brain of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 2008, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  Adam D. Schneider,et al.  The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion , 2012, PLoS biology.

[39]  A. Hudspeth Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  Optimized Parallel Coding of Second-Order Stimulus Features by Heterogeneous Neural Populations , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Adrian Carr,et al.  Insights into electrosensory organ development, physiology and evolution from a lateral line-enriched transcriptome , 2017, eLife.

[42]  Maurice J. Chacron,et al.  Parallel sparse and dense information coding streams in the electrosensory midbrain , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Perception and coding of envelopes in weakly electric fishes , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  Noah J. Cowan,et al.  Beyond the Jamming Avoidance Response: weakly electric fish respond to the envelope of social electrosensory signals , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[45]  C. Baker,et al.  Processing of second-order stimuli in the visual cortex. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[46]  Rüdiger Krahe,et al.  Statistics of the Electrosensory Input in the Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural architecture of the electrosensory lateral line lobe: adaptations for coincidence detection, a sensory searchlight and frequency-dependent adaptive filtering , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[48]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  Descending pathways generate perception of and neural responses to weak sensory input , 2018, PLoS biology.

[49]  G. Rose,et al.  Temporal filtering properties of midbrain neurons in an electric fish: implications for the function of dendritic spines , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[50]  R. H. Hamstra,et al.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Neural Heterogeneities Determine Response Characteristics to Second-, but Not First-Order Stimulus Features , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Electroreceptor neuron dynamics shape information transmission , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  André Longtin,et al.  The cellular basis for parallel neural transmission of a high-frequency stimulus and its low-frequency envelope , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  C E Carr,et al.  A Golgi study of the cell types of the dorsal torus semicircularis of the electric fish Eigenmannia: Functional and morphological diversity in the midbrain , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[56]  Patrick McGillivray,et al.  Parallel coding of first and second order stimulus attributes , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[57]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  Evolution of Sound and Balance Perception: Innovations that Aggregate Single Hair Cells into the Ear and Transform a Gravistatic Sensor into the Organ of Corti , 2012, Anatomical record.

[58]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural maps in the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[59]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  SK channel subtypes enable parallel optimized coding of behaviorally relevant stimulus attributes: A review , 2017, Channels.

[60]  Julie E. Elie,et al.  Neural processing of natural sounds , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Jamming Avoidance Response of High Frequency Electric Fish , 1972 .

[62]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. I. Columnar organization and estimation of receptive field size , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[63]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  Temporal decorrelation by SK channels enables efficient neural coding and perception of natural stimuli , 2016, Nature Communications.

[64]  W. Metzner The jamming avoidance response in Eigenmannia is controlled by two separate motor pathways , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[65]  C. Baker Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[66]  André Longtin,et al.  Postsynaptic Receptive Field Size and Spike Threshold Determine Encoding of High-frequency Information via Sensitivity to Synchronous Presynaptic Activity , 2008 .