Prototype-distortion category learning: A two-phase learning process across a distributed network

This paper reviews a body of work conducted in our laboratory that applies functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to better understand the biological response and change that occurs during prototype-distortion learning. We review results from two experiments (Little, Klein, Shobat, McClure, & Thulborn, 2004; Little & Thulborn, 2005) that provide support for increasing neuronal efficiency by way of a two-stage model that includes an initial period of recruitment of tissue across a distributed network that is followed by a period of increasing specialization with decreasing volume across the same network. Across the two studies, participants learned to classify patterns of random-dot distortions (Posner & Keele, 1968) into categories. At four points across this learning process subjects underwent examination by fMRI using a category-matching task. A large-scale network, altered across the protocol, was identified to include the frontal eye fields, both inferior and superior parietal lobules, and visual cortex. As behavioral performance increased, the volume of activation within these regions first increased and later in the protocol decreased. Based on our review of this work we propose that: (i) category learning is reflected as specialization of the same network initially implicated to complete the novel task, and (ii) this network encompasses regions not previously reported to be affected by prototype-distortion learning.

[1]  P J Reber,et al.  Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Petersen,et al.  The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[5]  K. Thulborn,et al.  Correlations of cortical activation and behavior during the application of newly learned categories. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Changing patterns of brain activation during category learning revealed by functional MRI. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[8]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  A. Markman,et al.  Category use and category learning. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Time-Dependent Changes in Learning Audiovisual Associations: A Single-Trial fMRI Study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  J. Desmond,et al.  The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  L. Squire,et al.  Learning about categories in the absence of memory. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Sex differences in the inferior parietal lobule. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[18]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Human Brain Regions Involved in Visual Categorization , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Gabrieli.  Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  R. Poldrack.  Imaging Brain Plasticity: Conceptual and Methodological Issues— A Theoretical Review , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1999 .

[22]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Fusiform gyrus volume reduction in first-episode schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[23]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Characterizing the neural mechanisms of skill learning and repetition priming: evidence from mirror reading. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[25]  Erratum: Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness (Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America (December 9, 1997) 94 (14015-14018)) , 1998 .

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  D. Homa,et al.  Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories , 1984 .

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Strategies and classification learning , 1981 .

[29]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory , 1999 .

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D R Shanks,et al.  Neuronal correlates of familiarity-driven decisions in artificial grammar learning , 2003, Neuroreport.

[33]  J B Poline,et al.  Human cortical networks for new and familiar sequences of saccades. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  L. Squire,et al.  Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  B. J. McCurtain,et al.  Dorsal cortical regions subserving visually guided saccades in humans: an fMRI study. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Proceedings in Computational Statistics , 1998 .

[38]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[39]  C. Carter,et al.  Complementary Category Learning Systems Identified Using Event-Related Functional MRI , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  The neurobiology of human category learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  S G Kim,et al.  Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[44]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation , 1998 .

[45]  M. Posner,et al.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  R. Passingham,et al.  Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.