Investigation on the milling performance of amputating clamping supports for machining with industrial robot

In recent years, monolithic components have been broadly applied in aviation industry; however, the machining process is a severe problem. In the machining process of complex and large workpieces, six-degree-of-freedom manipulators provide more accessibility than traditional five-axis CNC machining centers and allow the integration of additional axes to extend the workspace. Therefore, industrial robots have been widely used in machining processes, such as chamfering, deburring, and polishing. Generally, material removal rates are relatively low in these applications because the dimensions of the parts are not required to modify. However, very few industrial robots have been applied in milling processes. One of the major obstacles is the chatter phenomenon due to the low rigidity and stiffness of industrial robots as a result of the serial structure. These drawbacks substantially decrease the accuracy of traceability. In this paper, a novel milling tool was presented for industrial robot milling. The milling experiment of 7050-T7451 aeronautical aluminum alloy workpiece was performed using a KUKA industrial robot (Model: KR210 R2700 extra). Vibration acceleration signals in the milling process at different spindle speeds and different milling methods were analyzed. The vibration acceleration signals in frequency were obtained using fast Fourier transform to investigate whether the chatter took place or not. Besides, chips and machined surface quality were analyzed with a handheld microscope. Finally, the optimal spindle speed, feed speed, and milling method were obtained by theoretical analysis and response surface methodology, which helps to overcome the deficiencies of industrial robot milling. The novel milling tool was shown to be able to remove the clamping supports effectively.

[1]  Ulrich Schneider,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Sources of Error in Robot Machining , 2013 .

[2]  Bernd Kuhlenkoetter,et al.  Dynamic performance of industrial robot with CNC controller , 2017 .

[3]  Flavia Grassi,et al.  Lumped and Distributed-Parameter Circuit Models of the Electromagnetic Clamp , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Olivier Gibaru,et al.  Feedrate planning for machining with industrial six-axis robots , 2010 .

[5]  Ilian A. Bonev,et al.  An experimental study on the vibration response of a robotic machining system , 2013 .

[6]  Wei Ming Sim,et al.  Challenges of residual stress and part distortion in the civil airframe industry , 2010 .

[7]  Haoyong Yu,et al.  Composite Learning Robot Control With Friction Compensation: A Neural Network-Based Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Ulrich Schneider,et al.  Improving robotic machining accuracy through experimental error investigation and modular compensation , 2016 .

[9]  X. Qu,et al.  HCA520, a novel tumor associated antigen, involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis , 2003 .

[10]  Jing Li,et al.  Effect of the cutter path and the workpiece clamping position on the stability of the robotic milling system , 2017 .

[11]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Chatter analysis of robotic machining process , 2006 .

[12]  Panling Huang,et al.  Cutting signals analysis in milling titanium alloy thin-part components and non-thin-wall components , 2016 .

[13]  Yonghua Chen,et al.  Robot machining: recent development and future research issues , 2013 .

[14]  Miguel Ángel Sebastián,et al.  Overview of the State of Robotic Machining: Current Situation and Future Potential , 2015 .

[15]  Fei Ren-yuan Computer Simulation and Experimental Study on the Stability of Milling Processes , 2003 .

[16]  Shin-ichi Matsuoka,et al.  High-speed end milling of an articulated robot and its characteristics , 1999 .

[17]  M. El Badaoui,et al.  Robotic High Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloys , 2011 .

[18]  Wen-Tung Chang,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of a circular saw blade with self-clamped cutting inserts , 2016 .

[19]  M. Mourabet,et al.  Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite , 2017 .

[20]  Madeva Nagaral,et al.  Hardness and Tensile Behavior of Al2219-TiC Metal Matrix Composites , 2016 .

[21]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  Evaluation of novel tool geometries in dry drilling aluminium 2024-T351/titanium Ti6Al4V stack , 2018, Journal of Materials Processing Technology.