Assessing the feasibility of a mobile health-supported clinical decision support system for nutritional triage in oncology outpatients using Arden Syntax

BACKGROUND Nutritional screening procedures followed by regular nutrition monitoring for oncological outpatients are no standard practice in many European hospital wards and outpatient settings. As a result, early signs of malnutrition are missed and nutritional treatment is initiated when patients have already experienced severe weight loss. OBJECTIVE We report on a novel clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the global assessment and nutritional triage of the nutritional condition of oncology outpatients. The system combines clinical and laboratory data collected in the clinical setting with patient-generated data from a smartphone application for monitoring the patients' nutritional status. Our objective is to assess the feasibility of a CDSS that combines the aforementioned data sources and describe its integration into a hospital information system. Furthermore, we collected patients' opinions on the value of the system, and whether they would regard the system as a useful aid in coping with their condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS The system implements the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) to monitor nutritional status in the outpatient setting. A smartphone application is used to collect patient-generated data by performing weekly mini-surveys on patients concerning their eating habits, weight, and overall well-being. Data are uploaded on completion of each mini-survey and stored on a secure server at the Medical University of Vienna (MUV). The data are then combined with relevant clinical information from the Vienna General Hospital (VGH) information system. The knowledge base for the CDSS is implemented in medical logic modules (MLMs) using Arden Syntax. A three-month pilot clinical trial was performed to test the feasibility of the system. Qualitative questionnaires were used to obtain the patients' opinions on the usability and personal value of the system during the four-week test period. RESULTS We used the existing separation between the scientific and clinical data domains in the secured network environment (SNE) at the MUV and VGH to our advantage by importing, storing, and processing both patient-generated and routine data in the scientific data domain. To limit exposure to the SNE, patient-generated data stored outside the SNE were imported to the scientific domain once a day. The CDSS created for nutritional assessment and triage comprised ten MLMs, each including either a sub-assessment or the final results of the PG-SGA. Finally, an interface created for the hospital information system showed the results directly in clinical routine. In all 22 patients completed the clinical study. The results of the questionnaires showed that 91% of the patients were generally happy with the usability of the system, 91% believed that the application was of additional value in detecting cancer-related malnutrition, and 82% found it helpful as a long-term monitoring tool. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Despite strict protection of the clinical data domain, a CDSS employing patient-generated data can be integrated into clinical routine. The CDSS discussed in this report combined the information entered into a smartphone application with clinical data in order to inform the physician of a patient's nutritional status and thus permit suitable and timely intervention. The initial results show that the smartphone application was well accepted by patients, who considered it useful, but not many oncological outpatients were willing to participate in the clinical study because they did not possess an Android phone or lacked smartphone expertise. Furthermore, the results indicate that patient-generated data could be employed to augment clinical data and calculate metrics such as the PG-SGA without excessive effort by using a secure intermediate location as the locus of data storage and processing.

[1]  Matthias Samwald,et al.  The Arden Syntax standard for clinical decision support: Experiences and directions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  E Postrach,et al.  Effektivität eines Internet-basierten Programms zur eigenverantwortlichen Gewichtsreduktion: Eine Proof-of-principle Studie , 2012 .

[3]  Paula Ravasco,et al.  Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  E Monteiro,et al.  Big is Beautiful: Electronic Patient Records in Large Norwegian Hospitals 1980s – 2001 , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  G Hripcsak,et al.  Writing Arden Syntax Medical Logic Modules. , 1994, Computers in biology and medicine.

[6]  C. Tishelman,et al.  Nutritional support and risk status among cancer patients in palliative home care services , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[7]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. , 2005, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[8]  J. Morley,et al.  Cachexia: pathophysiology and clinical relevance. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[10]  D. Gupta,et al.  Impact of improved nutritional status on survival in ovarian cancer , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[11]  G. Biolo,et al.  Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) "cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" and "nutrition in geriatrics". , 2010, Clinical nutrition.

[12]  A. Barak,et al.  Defining Internet-Supported Therapeutic Interventions , 2009, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[13]  A. Detsky,et al.  Parenteral nutrition in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Nutrition.

[14]  M Ferguson,et al.  Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer , 2002, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[15]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  How nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals: a survey of 21,007 patients findings from the 2007-2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey. , 2010, Clinical nutrition.

[16]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Using Internet and Mobile Phone Technology to Deliver an Automated Physical Activity Program: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Meurig Sage,et al.  Perceptions of the use of a remote monitoring system in patients receiving palliative care at home. , 2008, International journal of palliative nursing.

[18]  K. Biggs Malnutrition screening programs in adult cancer patients: clinical practice is hungry for evidence. , 2012, Current oncology.

[19]  G. Bodoky,et al.  ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Non-surgical oncology. , 2006, Clinical nutrition.

[20]  M. C. Reid,et al.  Older adults are mobile too!Identifying the barriers and facilitators to older adults’ use of mHealth for pain management , 2013, BMC Geriatrics.

[21]  K. Patrick,et al.  A Text Message–Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  C. Pichard,et al.  Impact of nutrition on quality of life during cancer , 2007, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[23]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Health economic impact of managing patients following a community-based diagnosis of malnutrition in the UK. , 2011, Clinical nutrition.

[24]  Maureen B Huhmann,et al.  Importance of nutritional screening in treatment of cancer-related weight loss. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  R. Bellantone,et al.  Prevention and treatment of cancer cachexia: new insights into an old problem. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[26]  P. Boscolo-Rizzo,et al.  Early nutritional intervention improves treatment tolerance and outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[27]  B. Kasimis,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) Appetite Scale in veteran cancer patients. , 2005, The journal of supportive oncology.

[28]  L. Mariani,et al.  Weight loss in cancer patients: a plea for a better awareness of the issue , 2012, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[29]  M. Elia,et al.  ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. , 2003, Clinical nutrition.

[30]  A. Inui,et al.  Therapy Insight: cancer anorexia–cachexia syndrome—when all you can eat is yourself , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[31]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. , 1989 .

[32]  F. Bozzetti,et al.  Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1,000 outpatients , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[33]  E. Perez,et al.  North Central Cancer Treatment Group--achievements and perspectives. , 2008, Seminars in oncology.