Thermodynamics of Error Correction

Information processing at the molecular scale is limited by thermal fluctuations. This can cause undesired consequences in copying information since thermal noise can lead to errors that can compromise the functionality of the copy. For example, a high error rate during DNA duplication can lead to cell death. Given the importance of accurate copying at the molecular scale, it is fundamental to understand its thermodynamic features. In this paper, we derive a universal expression for the copy error as a function of entropy production and {\cred work dissipated by the system during wrong incorporations}. Its derivation is based on the second law of thermodynamics, hence its validity is independent of the details of the molecular machinery, be it any polymerase or artificial copying device. Using this expression, we find that information can be copied in three different regimes. In two of them, work is dissipated to either increase or decrease the error. In the third regime, the protocol extracts work while correcting errors, reminiscent of a Maxwell demon. As a case study, we apply our framework to study a copy protocol assisted by kinetic proofreading, and show that it can operate in any of these three regimes. We finally show that, for any effective proofreading scheme, error reduction is limited by the chemical driving of the proofreading reaction.

[1]  J. Parrondo,et al.  Intermittent transcription dynamics for the rapid production of long transcripts of high fidelity. , 2013, Cell reports.

[2]  M. Esposito,et al.  Extracting chemical energy by growing disorder: efficiency at maximum power , 2009, 0907.2502.

[3]  Hong Qian,et al.  Open-system thermodynamic analysis of DNA polymerase fidelity , 2009, Physical biology.

[4]  Massimiliano Esposito,et al.  Second law and Landauer principle far from equilibrium , 2011, 1104.5165.

[5]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Dissipation-error tradeoff in proofreading. , 1979, Bio Systems.

[6]  Shaheynoor Talukder,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[7]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Ninio Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. , 1975, Biochimie.

[9]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Physical Limit to Concentration Sensing Amid Spurious Ligands. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[10]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Backtracking determines the force sensitivity of RNAP II in a factor-dependent manner , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Speed, dissipation, and error in kinetic proofreading , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Sagawa,et al.  Thermodynamics of information , 2015, Nature Physics.

[13]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  Hani S. Zaher,et al.  Fidelity at the Molecular Level: Lessons from Protein Synthesis , 2009, Cell.

[15]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  The energy-speed-accuracy tradeoff in sensory adaptation , 2012, Nature Physics.

[16]  D. Andrieux,et al.  Nonequilibrium generation of information in copolymerization processes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. von Neumann,et al.  Probabilistic Logic and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms from Unreliable Components , 1956 .

[18]  K. Johnson,et al.  Conformational coupling in DNA polymerase fidelity. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  D. Andrieux,et al.  Molecular information processing in nonequilibrium copolymerizations. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Christopher Jarzynski,et al.  Work and information processing in a solvable model of Maxwell’s demon , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  C Blomberg,et al.  Thermodynamic constraints on kinetic proofreading in biosynthetic pathways. , 1980, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Schnakenberg Network theory of microscopic and macroscopic behavior of master equation systems , 1976 .

[23]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Discriminatory proofreading regimes in non-equilibrium systems , 2013, 1312.2286.

[24]  Hong Qian,et al.  Reducing intrinsic biochemical noise in cells and its thermodynamic limit. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  D. Andrieux,et al.  Information erasure in copolymers , 2013, 1305.4488.

[26]  Paul François,et al.  Chemodetection in fluctuating environments: Receptor coupling, buffering, and antagonism , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Magnus Johansson,et al.  Rate and accuracy of bacterial protein synthesis revisited. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[28]  T. Pape,et al.  Induced fit in initial selection and proofreading of aminoacyl‐tRNA on the ribosome , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[29]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  DNA Template Dependent Accuracy Variation of Nucleotide Selection in Transcription , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  Kinetic versus energetic discrimination in biological copying. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[31]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  TEMPLATE-DIRECTED BIOPOLYMERIZATION: TAPE-COPYING TURING MACHINES ∗ , 2012, 1212.6827.

[32]  Kinetics and thermodynamics of first-order Markov chain copolymerization. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  The thermodynamics of computation—a review , 1982 .