What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

This article reports a theoretical and experimental attempt to relate and contrast 2 traditionally separate research programs: inattentional blindness and attention capture. Inattentional blindness refers to failures to notice unexpected objects and events when attention is otherwise engaged. Attention capture research has traditionally used implicit indices (e.g., response times) to investigate automatic shifts of attention. Because attention capture usually measures performance whereas inattentional blindness measures awareness, the 2 fields have existed side by side with no shared theoretical framework. Here, the authors propose a theoretical unification, adapting several important effects from the attention capture literature to the context of sustained inattentional blindness. Although some stimulus properties can influence noticing of unexpected objects, the most influential factor affecting noticing is a person's own attentional goals. The authors conclude that many--but not all--aspects of attention capture apply to inattentional blindness but that these 2 classes of phenomena remain importantly distinct.

[1]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[2]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[3]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[4]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention , 1964 .

[5]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time , 1972 .

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective encoding from multielement visual displays , 1973 .

[8]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[9]  M. Potter Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[10]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[11]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[14]  C. Trevarthen Review: Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology , 1977 .

[15]  Anne D. Pick,et al.  Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson , 1979 .

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[22]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[23]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[24]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[25]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[26]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[30]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  S. Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortical connections , 1988, Nature.

[32]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[33]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[35]  M. Posner Foundations of cognitive science , 1989 .

[36]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Richard F. Haines,et al.  A Breakdown in Simultaneous Information Processing , 1991 .

[39]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Presbyopia research : from molecular biology to visual adaptation , 1991 .

[40]  I. Rock,et al.  Perception without attention: Results of a new method , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[42]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  M. Potter Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[46]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[47]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony Is Not Necessary for Motion Perception or Metacontrast Masking , 1993 .

[48]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[50]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  E. Marg A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[55]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  D. Levin CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[60]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[62]  P. McCormick Orienting attention without awareness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  I Rock,et al.  Inattentional Blindness as a Function of Proximity to the Focus of Attention , 1998, Perception.

[64]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[66]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  Neelam Naikar,et al.  A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention , 1999 .

[68]  V. Coltheart Fleeting memories : cognition of brief visual stimuli , 1999 .

[69]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Attention without awareness in blindsight , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[72]  K. Nakayama,et al.  On the Functional Role of Implicit Visual Memory for the Adaptive Deployment of Attention Across Scenes , 2000 .

[73]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Awareness: A Linking Proposition , 2000 .

[74]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[75]  J. Wolfe Inattentional Amnesia , 2000 .

[76]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[77]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  PSYCHE an interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness Sustained Inattentional Blindness : The Role of Location in the Detection of Unexpected Dynamic Events , 2000 .

[78]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[79]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[80]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[81]  Jochen Braun It's Great But Not Necessarily About Attention , 2001 .

[82]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  1 Temporal Contextual Cueing Title : Temporal contextual cueing of visual attention , 2001 .

[83]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[84]  M. Chun,et al.  Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[85]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[86]  B. Gibson,et al.  Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology , 2001 .

[87]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  7 – Attention Capture, Orienting, and Awareness , 2001 .

[88]  B. Gibson,et al.  3 – Inattentional Blindness and Attentional Capture: Evidence for Attention-Based Theories of Visual Salience , 2001 .

[89]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[90]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  Cathleen M. Moore,et al.  Inattentional Blindness: Perception or Memory and What Does It Matter? , 2001 .

[92]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[93]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[94]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[95]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[96]  G. Woodman,et al.  Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.

[97]  V. Lamme Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[99]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[100]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight , 2004, Neuropsychologia.