Evaluation of therapeutic radiographer contouring for magnetic resonance image guided online adaptive prostate radiotherapy

[1]  U. Oelfke,et al.  Prostate Volume Changes during Extreme and Moderately Hypofractionated Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Radiotherapy. , 2022, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[2]  R. Huddart,et al.  Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy , 2022, Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology.

[3]  G. Landry,et al.  Dosimetric impact of deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation on radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer , 2022, Radiation oncology.

[4]  P. Balermpas,et al.  Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[5]  G. O'Gara,et al.  Radiographer-led online image guided adaptive radiotherapy: A qualitative investigation of the therapeutic radiographer role , 2021, Radiography.

[6]  Daniela Thorwarth,et al.  First experience of autonomous, un-supervised treatment planning integrated in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy and delivered to a patient with prostate cancer. , 2021, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  B. Raaymakers,et al.  ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology. , 2021, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  J. Lagopoulos,et al.  Prostate cancer GTV delineation with biparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET: comparison of expert contours and semi-automated methods. , 2021, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Evaluation of daily online contour adaptation by radiation therapists for prostate cancer treatment on an MRI-guided linear accelerator , 2021, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[10]  S. Nill,et al.  Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: Initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac , 2020, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[11]  H. McNair,et al.  Laser-free pelvic alignment in an online adaptive radiotherapy environment , 2020, Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology.

[12]  Cynthia L Eccles,et al.  Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy , 2019, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  S Mutic,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience. , 2018, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[14]  B. Raaymakers,et al.  Evaluation of Online Plan Adaptation Strategies for the 1.5T MR-linac Based on “First-In-Man” Treatments , 2018, Cureus.

[15]  A N T J Kotte,et al.  First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Minsong Cao,et al.  Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Implementation of a New Process of Care , 2017, Cureus.

[17]  Michael G Jameson,et al.  A review of interventions to reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology , 2016, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[18]  V N Hansen,et al.  Radiographer-led plan selection for bladder cancer radiotherapy: initiating a training programme and maintaining competency. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  I. Locke,et al.  Are therapeutic radiographers able to achieve clinically acceptable verification for stereotactic lung radiotherapy treatment (SBRT)? , 2015, Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice.

[20]  J. Battista,et al.  Impact of Contouring Variability on Dose-Volume Metrics used in Treatment Plan Optimization of Prostate IMRT , 2013 .

[21]  M. Middleton,et al.  Prostate contouring variation: can it be fixed? , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Michael G Jameson,et al.  A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology , 2010, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[23]  Wendy L. Smith,et al.  Prostate volume contouring: a 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Filip Claus,et al.  Interobserver Delineation Variation Using CT versus Combined CT + MRI in Intensity–Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[25]  V. Khoo,et al.  Do differences in target volume definition in prostate cancer lead to clinically relevant differences in normal tissue toxicity? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  J. Balyckyi,et al.  Machine verification radiographs: an opportunity for role extension? , 2000 .

[27]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  J J Prete,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 1998, Radiology.

[29]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.