Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution.

Understanding the developmental and genetic underpinnings of particular evolutionary changes has been hindered by inadequate databases of evolutionary anatomy and by the lack of a computational approach to identify underlying candidate genes and regulators. By contrast, model organism studies have been enhanced by ontologies shared among genomic databases. Here, we suggest that evolutionary and genomics databases can be developed to exchange and use information through shared phenotype and anatomy ontologies. This would facilitate computing on evolutionary questions pertaining to the genetic basis of evolutionary change, the genetic and developmental bases of correlated characters and independent evolution, biomedical parallels to evolutionary change, and the ecological and paleontological correlates of particular types of change in genes, gene networks and developmental pathways.

[1]  R. Hill,et al.  Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[2]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  H. Thomas Systems biology and the biology of systems: how, if at all, are they related? , 2007, The New phytologist.

[4]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[5]  F. Delsuc,et al.  Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Jonathan B L Bard,et al.  Anatomics: the intersection of anatomy and bioinformatics , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  C. Marshall Encyclopedia of Life , 2008 .

[8]  M. Ashburner,et al.  An ontology for cell types , 2005, Genome Biology.

[9]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  WonderWeb Deliverable D18 Ontology Library , 2003 .

[10]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[11]  Cynthia Brandt,et al.  WebEAV: automatic metadata-driven generation of web interfaces to entity-attribute-value databases. , 2000, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[12]  Marc W Kirschner,et al.  The Meaning of Systems Biology , 2005, Cell.

[13]  Hong-Wen Deng,et al.  PhD: a web database application for phenotype data management , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  Jim Diederich,et al.  Construction and integration of large character sets for nematode morpho-anatomical data , 1997 .

[15]  Carol Friedman,et al.  Visualizing information across multidimensional post-genomic structured and textual databases , 2005, Bioinform..

[16]  Jim Diederich Basic properties for biological databases: Character development and support , 1997 .

[17]  D. Maddison,et al.  NEXUS: an extensible file format for systematic information. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[18]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Robert Stevens,et al.  Constructing ontology-driven protein family databases , 2005, Bioinform..

[20]  F.M. Fontal‐Cazalla,et al.  Phylogeny of the Eucoilinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[21]  Eain C. J. Green,et al.  Ontologies for the Description of Mouse Phenotypes , 2004, Comparative and functional genomics.

[22]  Perry L. Miller,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Organization of Heterogeneous Scientific Data Using the EAV/CR Representation , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  M. Tristem Molecular Evolution — A Phylogenetic Approach. , 2000, Heredity.

[24]  L. V. Van Valen,et al.  Homology and causes , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[25]  John G. Lundberg,et al.  Wagner Networks and Ancestors , 1972 .

[26]  T. Jenssen,et al.  A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression , 2001, Nature Genetics.