For optical interconnects to become a mature technology they must be amenable to electronic packaging technology. Two main obstacles to including free-space optical interconnects are alignment and heat-dissipation issues. Here we study the issues of alignment tolerancing that are due to assembly and manufacturing variations (passive-element tolerancing) over long board-level distances (>10 cm) for free-space optical interconnects. We also combine these variations with active optoelectronic device variations (active-element tolerancing). We demonstrate a computer-aided analysis procedure that permits one to determine both active- and passive-element tolerances needed to achieve some system-level specification, such as yield or cost. The procedure that we employ relies on developing a detailed design of the system to be studied in a standard optical design program, such as code v. Using information from this model, we can determine the integrated power falling on the detector, which we term optical throughput, by performing Gaussian propagation or general Fresnel propagation (if significant vignetting occurs). This optical throughput can be used to determine system-level performance criteria, such as bit-error rate. With this computer-aided analysis technique, a sensitivity analysis of all the variations under study is made on a system with realistic board-level interconnect distances to find each perturbation's relative effects (with other perturbations set to 0) on the power falling on the detector. This information is used to set initial tolerances for subsequent tolerancing analysis and design runs. A tolerancing analysis by Monte Carlo techniques is applied to determine if the yield or cost (yield is denned as the percentage of systems that have acceptable system performance) is acceptable. With a technique called parametric sampling, a subsequent tolerancing design run can be applied to optimize this yield or cost with little increase in computation. We study a design example and show that most of the tolerances can be achieved with current technology.
[1]
Frank Sauer,et al.
Refractive-diffractive micro-optics for permutation interconnects
,
1994
.
[2]
A. K. Ghosh,et al.
Optimization of alignability in integrated planar-optical interconnect packages.
,
1993,
Applied optics.
[3]
Robert H. Ginsberg.
Synopsis "Outline of tolerancing (from performance specification to toleranced drawings)"
,
1981
.
[4]
S H Lee,et al.
Design methods for space-variant optical interconnections to achieve optimum power throughput.
,
1995,
Applied optics.
[5]
Jian Ma,et al.
Misalignment sensitivity analysis of planar optical interconnect systems
,
1994,
Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.
[6]
J. P. Crenn,et al.
Changes in the characteristics of a Gaussian beam weakly diffracted by a circular aperture.
,
1982,
Applied optics.
[7]
Donald G. Koch.
A Statistical Approach To Lens Tolerancing
,
1978,
Optics & Photonics.
[8]
H. S. Hinton,et al.
Optical interconnections using microlens arrays
,
1992
.
[9]
K. Singhal,et al.
Statistical design centering and tolerancing using parametric sampling
,
1981
.
[10]
L D Dickson,et al.
Characteristics of a propagating gaussian beam.
,
1970,
Applied optics.
[11]
R K Kostuk,et al.
Reducing alignment and chromatic sensitivity of holographic optical interconnects with substrate-mode holograms.
,
1989,
Applied optics.
[12]
Jian Ma,et al.
Alignment issues in packaging for free-space optical interconnects
,
1994
.