NET TIME NEGOTIATIONS WITHIN THE FAMILY

Drawing on data from one-on-one and focus group interviews with high school students from schools in agricultural California, this research examines how American families negotiate what we call net time. The article explores intra-familial bargaining over time spent on the internet. Analysis pays special attention to families that prioritize capital-enhancing activities such as schoolwork and college applications. In these families, access to resources is guided by implicit social contracts between parents and children, as well as between siblings. The findings illuminate how these social contracts imply particular rights and responsibilities depending on the families' level of wiredness: highly wired, partially wired, and unwired families. Comparing the experiences of students from these three groups reveals that members of each kind of family experience a different form of net time. While youths from highly wired families enjoy individualized net time, members of partially wired families divvy up household net time. The most disadvantaged youth come from unwired families in which family members must make sacrifices for youth to obtain net time outside of the household. The examination illuminates the logics that underpin the familial negotiations over each kind of net time. Ultimately, familial social contracts over net time have the power to encourage or hinder use of net time for capital-enhancing activities.

[1]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children and the Internet , 1994 .

[2]  Petros Panaou,et al.  Kids and credibility: an empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility , 2012 .

[3]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach , 2006 .

[4]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Make Money Surfing the Web? The Impact of Internet Use on the Earnings of U.S. Workers , 2008 .

[5]  Sook-Jung Lee,et al.  Children's Internet Use in a Family Context: Influence on Family Relationships and Parental Mediation , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Laura Robinson.  A TASTE FOR THE NECESSARY , 2009 .

[7]  S. Livingstone.  Children and the internet: great expectations, challenging realities , 2009 .

[8]  Aafke Komter,et al.  Social Solidarity and the Gift , 2004 .

[9]  Helen Wilson,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society [Book Review] , 2005 .

[10]  David Hardisty,et al.  On the Internet , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  V. Thiessen,et al.  DIGITAL DIVIDES AND CAPITAL CONVERSION: The optimal use of information and communication technology for youth reading achievement , 2007 .

[12]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[13]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM , 2001 .

[14]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media . , 2010 .

[16]  Anne Elliott.  Screenplay: Children and Computing in the Home , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[17]  Toke Haunstrup Christensen,et al.  'Connected presence' in distributed family life , 2009, New Media Soc..

[18]  P. Bourdieu.  Le sens pratique , 1976 .

[19]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Cultural (Re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative , 2006 .

[20]  J. Lanigan,et al.  Computers in the Family Context: Perceived Impact on Family Time and Relationships , 2009 .

[21]  Kristin Luker,et al.  Salsa dancing into the social sciences : research in an age of info-glut , 2008 .

[22]  M. Thompson.  Family development theory. , 1984, The Nurse practitioner.

[23]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Coming of age with the internet , 2006, New Media Soc..

[24]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Kids and Credibility: An Empirical Examination of Youth, Digital Media Use, and Information Credibility , 2010 .

[25]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[26]  Ann Locke Davidson,et al.  Bringing the Internet to School: Lessons from an Urban District , 2002 .

[27]  S. Cotten,et al.  USING AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGY TO DECREASE DIGITAL INEQUALITY , 2011 .

[28]  Joseph D. Straubhaar,et al.  Communities, cultural capital, and the digital divide , 2003 .

[29]  Xavier Folgado.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2014 .

[30]  Cees J. Hamelink,et al.  The ethics of cyberspace , 2001 .

[31]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[32]  Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen,et al.  ‘Families’ , 1992, Accidental Feminism.

[33]  Jie Huang,et al.  The digital divide and academic achievement , 2006, Electron. Libr..

[34]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[35]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2012 .

[36]  Lisa Tripp,et al.  ‘The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for schoolwork’: Challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate children’s access to the internet , 2011, New Media Soc..