Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area

We investigated how habitat fragmentation affects the movement of marked bumblebees between plant patches in a temperate conservation area in metropolitan Boston, Massachusetts. Our study was conducted on populations of sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia L. f.) separated by a road and natural woodland, and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis L.) separated by a railroad. Bumblebees showed high site fidelity and only rarely crossed roads or railroads. When bees captured at one sweet pepperbush population were moved across a road to a new sweet pepperbush population and released, they returned to their original site, some within 20 min of their capture. When all inflorescences were removed from one sweet pepperbush patch, most bees moved to another sweet pepperbush population on the same side of the road. The results show that while bumblebees have the ability to cross a road and railroad, these human structures may restrict bumblebee movement and act to fragment plant populations because of the innate site fidelity displayed by foraging bees. Moreover, marked bees were almost never observed to move between populations unless they were displaced, or forced to seek additional forage sites.

[1]  W. Dramstad,et al.  Do bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) really forage close to their nests? , 1996, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[2]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  THE FORAGING SPECIALIZATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL BUMBLEBEES , 1976 .

[3]  R. Didham,et al.  Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  "Majoring" and "Minoring" by Foraging Bumblebees, Bombus Vagans: An Experimental Analysis , 1979 .

[5]  H. Mader,et al.  Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields , 1984 .

[6]  David W. Inouye,et al.  Techniques for Pollination Biologists , 1993 .

[7]  M. Aizen,et al.  HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, NATIVE INSECT POLLINATORS, AND FERAL HONEY BEES IN ARGENTINE, "CHACO SERRANO"' , 1994 .

[8]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar , 1999 .

[9]  G. Powell,et al.  Population dynamics of male euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments , 1987 .

[10]  I. Rasmussen,et al.  Gene flow inferred from seed dispersal and pollinator behaviour compared to DNA analysis of restriction site variation in a patchy population of Lotus corniculatus L. , 1992, Oecologia.

[11]  Candace Galen,et al.  Landmarks or obstacles: the effects of spatial heterogeneity on bumble bee foraging behavior , 1985 .

[12]  L. Harder,et al.  Response of traplining bumble bees to competition experiments: shifts in feeding location and efficiency , 2004, Oecologia.

[13]  A. Norderhaug.  Mating systems of three meadow plant species , 1995 .

[14]  A. Manning,et al.  Some Aspects of the Foraging Behaviour of Bumble-Bees , 1956 .

[15]  G. Powell,et al.  Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments , 1986 .

[16]  Ola Jennersten.  Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set , 1988 .

[17]  J. Cane.  Habitat Fragmentation and Native Bees: a Premature Verdict? , 2001 .

[18]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[19]  G. Fry,et al.  Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscape , 1997 .

[20]  J. Hartman,et al.  Safe sites and the regeneration of Clethra alnifolia L. (Clethraceae) in wetland forests in central New Jersey , 1995 .

[21]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[22]  M. W. Eijck,et al.  Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant species Gentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae) , 1994, Oecologia.

[23]  Marcelo A. Aizen,et al.  Forest Fragmentation, Pollination, and Plant Reproduction in a Chaco Dry Forest, Argentina , 1994 .

[24]  W. Kunin.  Population size and density effects in pollination : Pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber , 1997 .

[25]  B. Lamont,et al.  Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii — a demonstration of the Allee effect , 1993, Oecologia.

[26]  J. Richards,et al.  PROTANDRY, INCOMPATIBILITY, AND SECONDARY POLLEN PRESENTATION IN CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALS (RUBIACEAE) , 1993 .

[27]  M. Bowers.  Bumble Bee Colonization, Extinction, and Reproduction in Subalpine Meadows in Northeastern Utah , 1985 .

[28]  H. Dreisig.  Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees , 1995 .

[29]  James D. Thomson,et al.  Trapline foraging by bumblebees: I. Persistence of flight-path geometry , 1996 .

[30]  A. Saura,et al.  Gene Flow and Pollinator Behaviour in Silene dioica Populations , 1994 .

[31]  R. A. Wesselingh,et al.  Bumblebee pollination of understorey shrub species in a tropical montane forest in Costa Rica , 2000, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[32]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set , 1999, Oecologia.

[33]  L. Comba.  Patch use by bumblebees (Hymenoptera Apidae): temperature, wind, flower density and traplining , 1999 .

[34]  J. Osborne,et al.  Site constancy of bumble bees in an experimentally patchy habitat , 2001 .