Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: quantitative valuation

We reviewed studies providing quantitative measurements of abundance of fishes and large mobile crustaceans on oyster reefs and on nearby sedimentary habitat in the southeast United States. For each species, we compared density by size (age) class on oyster reefs and sedimentary bottom as a means of estimating the degree to which restoration of oyster reef on sedimentary bottom could augment abundances. By applying published information on growth rates of each species and a combination of empirical data and published information on age-specific survivorship, we calcu- lated the per-unit-area enhancement of production of fishes and large mobile crustaceans expected from the addition of oyster reef habitat. For this calculation, we gave the reef habitat full credit for the expected lifetime production of species whose recruitment was judged to be limited by the area of oyster reefs based on nearly exclusive association of recruits to reefs. For species that were only mod- estly enhanced in abundance by oyster reefs, we gave the reef credit for the fraction of production that is derived from consumption of reef-associated prey, using a combination of gut content data and natural history information. This combination of analyses and calculations revealed that 10 m 2 of restored oyster reef in the southeast United States is expected to yield an additional 2.6 kg yr -1 of pro- duction of fish and large mobile crustaceans for the functional lifetime of the reef. Because the reef is biogenic and self-sustaining, the lifetime of a reef protected from bottom-disturbing fishing gear is limited by intense storms or sedimentation. A reef lasting 20 to 30 yr would be expected to augment fish and large mobile crustacean production by a cumulative amount of 38 to 50 kg 10 m -2 , discounted to present-day value. This set of calculations assumes that oyster reef habitat now limits production of reef-associated fish and crustaceans in the southeast United States. This assumption seems reasonable based on the tight associations of so many fishes with reef-dependent prey, and the depletion of reef habitat over the past century.

[1]  H. Wells.  The Fauna of Oyster Beds, with Special Reference to the Salinity Factor , 1961 .

[2]  T. Savage,et al.  Growth and claw regeneration of the stone crab, Menippe mercenaria , 1978 .

[3]  M. Haimovici,et al.  Age and Growth of the Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, and Size-Age Composition of the Recreational Catch off the Southeastern United States , 1978 .

[4]  J. Dean,et al.  Age, growth rate and feeding habits of the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau (Linnaeus) in South Carolina☆ , 1982 .

[5]  D. L. Mason,et al.  Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida , 1984 .

[6]  The Ecology of the Apalachicola Bay System: An Estuarine Profile , 2018 .

[7]  Austin B. Williams,et al.  Synopsis of biological data on the blue crab, callinectes sapidus Rathbun , 1984 .

[8]  Species Profiles. Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (South Florida). STONE CRAB , 1984 .

[9]  B. J. Abraham.  Species Profiles. Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (Mid-Atlantic). MUMMICHOG AND STRIPED KILLIFISH. , 1985 .

[10]  E. Estevez,et al.  The ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: An estuarine profile , 1988 .

[11]  P. Doherty,et al.  The replenishment of coral reef fish populations , 1988 .

[12]  T. Minello,et al.  Oyster reef as habitat for estuarine macrofauna , 1989 .

[13]  P. Goulletquer,et al.  Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing , 1991 .

[14]  M. J. Hemmer,et al.  Reproductive ecology of the inland silverside, Menidia beryllina, (Pisces: Atherinidae) from Blackwater Bay, Florida , 1992 .

[15]  P. Hood,et al.  Age, growth, and reproduction of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis (pisces: serranidae), in the eastern Gulf of Mexico , 1992 .

[16]  M. Sheaves.  Patterns of distribution and abundance of fishes in different habitats of a mangrove-lined tropical estuary, as determined by fish trapping , 1992 .

[17]  L. Rozas.  Bottomless lift net for quantitatively sampling nekton on intertidal marshes , 1992 .

[18]  C. H. Peterson,et al.  Improvement of environmental impact analysis by application of principles derived from manipulative ecology: Lessons from coastal marine case histories , 1993 .

[19]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  The Trophic Cascade in Lakes , 1993 .

[20]  C. Peterson,et al.  An experimentalist's challenge: when artifacts of intervention interact with treatments , 1994 .

[21]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Corncrake Pie and Prediction in Ecology , 1996 .

[22]  Trophic studies on constructed “restored” oyster reefs , 1997 .

[23]  J. Serafy,et al.  Field studies on the ureogenic gulf toadfish in a subtropical bay. I. Patterns of abundance, size composition and growth , 1997 .

[24]  Donald A. Falk,et al.  Developing the Conceptual Basis for Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[25]  E. Irlandi,et al.  Habitat linkages: the effect of intertidal saltmarshes and adjacent subtidal habitats on abundance, movement, and growth of an estuarine fish , 1997, Oecologia.

[26]  M. Palmer,et al.  Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[27]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[28]  J. Castilla,et al.  The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems , 1997 .

[29]  R. Mann,et al.  Continuing trophic studies on constructed “restored” oyster reefs , 1998 .

[30]  M. Hixon.  Population dynamics of coral‐reef fishes: Controversial concepts and hypotheses , 1998 .

[31]  H. Lenihan,et al.  HOW HABITAT DEGRADATION THROUGH FISHERY DISTURBANCE ENHANCES IMPACTS OF HYPOXIA ON OYSTER REEFS , 1998 .

[32]  Charles H. Peterson,et al.  The influence of multiple environmental stressors on susceptibility to parasites: An experimental determination with oysters , 1999 .

[33]  Charles H. Peterson,et al.  Estuarine Vegetated Habitats as Corridors for Predator Movements , 1999 .

[34]  X. Niu,et al.  Recovery of oyster reefs (Crassostrea virginica) in a gulf estuary following disturbance by two hurricanes , 1999 .

[35]  R. Mann,et al.  Fish species richness in relation to restored oyster reefs, Piankatank river, Virginia , 1999 .

[36]  D. Breitburg,et al.  The role of oyster reefs as essential fish habitat: a review of current knowledge and some new perspectives , 1999 .

[37]  Brian E. Julius,et al.  Integrating biology and economics in seagrass restoration: How much is enough and why? , 2000 .

[38]  Integrating Evaluation into Reef Project Planning , 2000 .

[39]  R. Livingston.  Eutrophication Processes in Coastal Systems: Origin and Succession of Plankton Blooms and Effects on Secondary Production in Gulf Coast Estuaries , 2000 .

[40]  Loren D. Coen,et al.  Developing success criteria and goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: Ecological function or resource exploitation? , 2000 .

[41]  F. Micheli,et al.  Biological effects of shellfish harvesting on oyster reefs: resolving a fishery conflict by ecological experimentation , 2000 .

[42]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Cascading of habitat degradation: Oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress , 2001 .

[43]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[44]  A. Grootjans,et al.  Ecological Restoration: State of the Art or State of the Science? , 2001 .

[45]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[46]  J. Cornwell,et al.  Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and microphytobenthos on sediment nitrogen dynamics: A laboratory study , 2002 .

[47]  D. Haven,et al.  Destruction and Guidelines for Restoring Them , 2004 .