Compliant Mechanisms for Deployable Space Systems

Compliant Mechanisms for Deployable Space Systems Shannon A. Zirbel Department of Mechanical Engineering, BYU Doctor of Philosophy The purpose of this research is to develop fundamentals of compliant mechanisms in deployable space systems. The scope was limited to creating methods for thick origami, developing compliant deployable solar arrays, and developing methods for stowing and deploying the arrays. The research on actuation methods was focused on a one-time deployment of the array. Concepts for both passive and active actuation were considered. The primary objective of this work was to develop approaches to accommodate thickness in origami-based deployable arrays with a high ratio of deployed-to-stowed diameter. The HanaFlex design was derived from the origami flasher model and is developed as a deployable solar array for large arrays (150 kW or greater) and CubeSat arrays (60 W). The origami folding concept enables compact stowage of the array, which would be deployed from a hexagonal prism into a flat array with about a 10-times increase in deployed diameter as compared to stowed diameter. The work on the origami pattern for the solar array was also applied to the folding of 80-100 m solar sails for two NASA CubeSat missions, NEA-Scout and Lunar Flashlight. The CubeSat program is a promising avenue to put the solar array or solar sails into space for testing and proving their functionality. The deployable array concept is easily scalable, although application to CubeSats changes some of the design constraints. The thickness-to-diameter ratio is larger, making the issues of thickness more pronounced. Methods of actuation are also limited on CubeSats because of the rigorous size and weight constraints. This dissertation also includes the development of a compact, self-deploying array based on a tapered map fold design. The tapered map fold was modified by applying an elastic membrane to one side of the array and adequately spacing the panels adjacent to valley folds. Through this approach, the array can be folded into a fully dense stowed volume. Potential applications for the array include a collapsible solar array for military or backpacking applications. Additional compliant mechanism design was done in support of the HanaFlex array. This included a serpentine flexure to attach the array to the perimeter truss for deployment, and a bistable mechanism that may be used in the deployment of the array or sail.

[1]  Robert McIntyre Fowler,et al.  Flex-16: A Large-Displacement Monolithic Compliant Rotational Hinge , 2014 .

[2]  Douglas C. Hofmann,et al.  Shape Memory Bulk Metallic Glass Composites , 2010, Science.

[3]  M. Demetriou,et al.  Amorphous metals for hard-tissue prosthesis , 2010 .

[4]  Tom Moran,et al.  Non-explosive actuation for the ORBCOMM (TM) satellite , 1995 .

[5]  Robert O Ritchie,et al.  A damage-tolerant glass. , 2011, Nature materials.

[6]  Gyula Greschik,et al.  A Rule of Thumb for the Suspension of Film Sheets Without Catenaries , 2003 .

[7]  Richard J. Chater,et al.  The chemical composition of micrometeoroids impacting upon the solar arrays of the Hubble Space Telescope , 2004 .

[8]  Aaron T. Ohta,et al.  CubeSats: A bright future for nanosatellites , 2011 .

[9]  Steven Skiena,et al.  When Can You Fold a Map? , 2001, WADS.

[10]  Jordi Puig-Suari,et al.  The CubeSat: The Picosatellite Standard for Research and Education , 2008 .

[11]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Compliant multistable structural elements , 2008 .

[12]  Taketoshi Nojima Origami Modeling of Functional Structures based on Organic Patterns , 2007 .

[13]  Changzhi Li,et al.  Optimal Matched Rectifying Surface for Space Solar Power Satellite Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[14]  Mark Campbell,et al.  CubeSat design for LEO-based Earth science missions , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  Fabio Santoni,et al.  An innovative deployable solar panel system for Cubesats , 2014 .

[16]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Compliant space mechanisms: a new frontier for compliant mechanisms , 2011 .

[17]  Harvey J. Willenberg,et al.  Early commercial demonstration of space solar power using ultra-lightweight arrays , 2009 .

[18]  J. Lang,et al.  A curved-beam bistable mechanism , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[19]  D. A. VanHorn,et al.  Dynamic loads analysis of photovoltaic arrays for the space station , 1997 .

[20]  Karl O. Brauer EXPANDABLE STRUCTURES FOR SPACECRAFT , 1977 .

[21]  I. N. Statsenko,et al.  On the way to creating a system of distant power supply for space vehicles , 1996 .

[22]  Noam Lior,et al.  Power in space , 2001, Physics to a Degree.

[23]  S. D. Lewis,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADJUSTABLE BEARING PRELOAD ENABLED - OPTICAL TERMINAL , 2009 .

[24]  D. C. Maessen,et al.  Development of a generic inflatable de-orbit device for CubeSats , 2007 .

[25]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Inextensional wrapping of flat membranes , 1992 .

[26]  Samiran Das,et al.  Solar array mechanisms for Indian Satellites, APPLE, IRS and INSAT-IITS☆ , 1988 .

[27]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Design Optimization of a Fully-Compliant Bistable Micro-Mechanism , 2001, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[28]  Ken Higuchi,et al.  Unexpected behavior of a flexible solar array at retraction under microgravity , 2002 .

[29]  David Dureisseix,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Foldable/Unfoldable Corrugated Architectural Curved Envelop , 2012 .

[30]  Patrick K. Malone,et al.  Lightweight Inflatable Solar Array , 1996 .

[31]  Douglas C. Hofmann,et al.  Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Daniel L. Wilcox,et al.  Fully compliant tensural bistable micromechanisms (FTBM) , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[33]  William Purdy,et al.  Space vehicle mechanisms : elements of successful design , 1998 .

[34]  L. Howell,et al.  New Methods for Developing and Manufacturing Compliant Mechanisms Utilizing Bulk Metallic Glass , 2014 .

[35]  M.Raja Reddy,et al.  Space solar cells—tradeoff analysis , 2003 .

[36]  R.R. King,et al.  Flexible III-V Multijunction Solar Blanket , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[37]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Accommodating Thickness in Origami-Based Deployable Arrays , 2013 .

[38]  Tomohiro Tachi,et al.  Rigid-Foldable Thick Origami , 2010 .

[39]  S D Guest,et al.  Deployable membranes designed from folding tree leaves , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[40]  Brent Sherwood,et al.  The solar umbrella: A low-cost demonstration of scalable space based solar power , 2013, IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments.

[41]  W. F. Lunnon A map-folding problem , 1968 .

[42]  Makoto Ohsaki,et al.  Optimization of Retractable Structures Utilizing Bistable Compliant Mechanism , 2013 .

[43]  Wolfgang Seboldt,et al.  Space- and Earth-based solar power for the growing energy needs of future generations , 2004 .

[44]  Mengu Cho,et al.  Influence of space debris impact on solar array under power generation , 2008 .

[45]  David M. Murphy MegaFlex - The Scaling Potential of UltraFlex Technology , 2012 .

[46]  Hiroshi Furuya,et al.  Folding patterns of planar gossamer space structures consisting of membranes and booms , 2014 .

[47]  Hirotaka Sawada,et al.  First Solar Power Sail Demonstration by IKAROS , 2010 .

[48]  Y. Yang,et al.  A MEMS Bistable Device With Push-On–Push-Off Capability , 2013, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[49]  Jason Andrews,et al.  Nanosat Deorbit and Recovery System to Enable New Missions , 2011 .

[50]  Guimin Chen,et al.  A Tristable Mechanism Configuration Employing Orthogonal Compliant Mechanisms , 2010 .

[51]  Margaret Nazario Advancement of a 30kW Solar Electric Propulsion System Capability for NASA Human and Robotic Exploration Missions , 2013 .

[52]  J.S. Welsh,et al.  Development of a novel, passively deployed roll-out solar array , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[53]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Deployment Methods for an Origami-Inspired Rigid-Foldable Array , 2014 .

[54]  Annett Wechsler,et al.  Formulas For Natural Frequency And Mode Shape , 2016 .

[55]  Jeremy Straub CubeSats: A Low-Cost, Very High-Return Space Technology , 2012 .

[56]  John C. Mankins,et al.  A fresh look at space solar power: New architectures, concepts and technologies , 1997 .

[57]  W. F. Lunnon Multi-Dimensional Map-Folding , 1971, Comput. J..

[58]  Les Johnson,et al.  NanoSail-D: A solar sail demonstration mission , 2011 .

[59]  W. Johnson,et al.  Solution to the problem of the poor cyclic fatigue resistance of bulk metallic glasses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Douglas Sheldon,et al.  Near-Earth Asteroid Scout , 2014 .

[61]  Barbara A. Cohen,et al.  Lunar Flashlight: Mapping Lunar Surface Volatiles Using a Cubesat , 2015 .

[62]  Gloria J. Wiens,et al.  Parametric study on the use of Hoberman mechanisms for reconfigurable antenna and solar arrays , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[63]  Naoki Shinohara,et al.  A new concept of solar power satellite: Tethered-SPS , 2007 .

[64]  J. Puig-Suari,et al.  Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[65]  Tomohiro Tachi Geometric Considerations for the Design of Rigid Origami Structures , 2010 .

[66]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Space Frames with Multiple Stable Configurations , 2007 .

[67]  Alessandro Palmas Solar power satellites , 2013 .

[68]  Koryo Miura,et al.  Method of Packaging and Deployment of Large Membranes in Space , 1985 .

[69]  Scott Tibbitts High output paraffin actuators: Utilization in aerospace mechanisms , 1988 .

[70]  Matthew D. Lichter,et al.  On the design of large degree-of-freedom digital mechatronic devices based on bistable dielectric elastomer actuators , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[71]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  Experimental Demonstrations for a New Design Paradigm in Space Robotics , 2000, ISER.

[72]  Andrew F. Heaton,et al.  Validation of Solar Sail Simulations for the NASA Solar Sail Demonstration Project , 2014 .

[73]  Martin Trautz,et al.  Deployable folded plate structures - folding patterns based on 4-fold-mechanism using stiff plates , 2010 .

[74]  D. Law,et al.  Lightweight, Flexible, High-Efficiency III-V Multijunction Cells , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[75]  Hans S. Rauschenbach,et al.  Solar Cell Array Design Handbook: The Principles and Technology of Photovoltaic Energy Conversion , 1980 .

[76]  John E. Prussing,et al.  Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics, and Mission Applications , 2000 .

[77]  Julie A. Rodiek,et al.  Space solar array reliability: A study and recommendations , 2008 .

[78]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Spherical Bistable Micromechanism , 2008 .

[79]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Design of Ultrathin Composite Self-Deployable Booms , 2014 .

[80]  Bill Purdy Advanced release technologies program , 1994 .

[81]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Design of two-link, in-plane, bistable compliant micro-mechanisms , 1999 .

[82]  P. Weaver,et al.  On the thermally induced bistability of composite cylindrical shells for morphing structures , 2012 .

[83]  Henry R. Hertzfeld,et al.  Cubesats: Cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations , 2011 .