Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network

Few case studies have considered the impact of network structure on the resilience of complex resource management systems that operate over large spatial scales. To help fill this knowledge gap our study examined two types of relational ties-knowledge exchange and policy influence-within a marine wildlife co-management network in Northern Australia. We conducted interviews and follow-up surveys with key-informant stakeholders in dugong and marine turtle management and used these data to perform social network analysis for the dugong and turtle co-management network. The network structure of this marine governance system supports extensive cross-scale information flow, but with a disproportionate amount of top-down policy influence compared with knowledge accumulation, an arrangement that may hinder evidence-based decision making. We developed a typological 'map' of stakeholder roles in the network to characterize each stakeholder's contribution of knowledge and ability to influence policy, helping to identify gaps or overlaps in network linkages. Improving communication links between knowledge producers and policy makers is important for evidence based decision making throughout the management network, while addressing overlapping management roles and functions should help decrease conflict in the system. These improvements would increase social-ecological resilience in the management network by providing better protection for marine species while meeting the needs of diverse stakeholders.

[1]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[2]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[3]  M. Fernández-Giménez,et al.  Integration or co-optation? Traditional knowledge and science in the Alaska Beluga Whale Committee , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[4]  A. Bryman,et al.  The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (three volumes) , 2003 .

[5]  Annica Sandström,et al.  The network structure of adaptive governance - A single case study of a fish management area , 2009 .

[6]  J. Anderies,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[7]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[8]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Cross‐cultural environmental research and management: Challenges and progress , 2009 .

[9]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Navigating Social–Ecological Systems: Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? , 2002 .

[10]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[11]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[12]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[13]  H. Ross,et al.  Exploring Discourses in Environmental Decision Making: An Indigenous Hunting Case Study , 2010 .

[14]  J. Anderies,et al.  Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[15]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Penelope Hawe,et al.  Use of social network analysis to map the social relationships of staff and teachers at school. , 2007, Health education research.

[17]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Network approach for understanding small-scale fisheries governance: The case of the Chilean coastal co-management system , 2010 .

[18]  Ian J. McNiven,et al.  Ritually Orchestrated Seascapes: Hunting Magic and Dugong Bone Mounds in Torres Strait, NE Australia , 2003, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[19]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[20]  Guizzo Bs,et al.  [The software QSR Nvivo 2.0 in qualitative data analysis: a tool for health and human sciences researches]. , 2003 .

[21]  L. Carlsson,et al.  Network Governance of the Commons , 2007 .

[22]  J. Ebbesson,et al.  The rule of law in governance of complex socio-ecological changes , 2010 .

[23]  D. Bellwood,et al.  New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[25]  C. Folke,et al.  Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden , 2006 .

[26]  N. Lin Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[27]  Carl Folke,et al.  Navigating social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[28]  F. Berkes,et al.  Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  C. Folke,et al.  Enhancing the Fit through Adaptive Co-management: Creating and Maintaining Bridging Functions for Matching Scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden , 2007 .

[30]  B. Crona,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Governance Power Asymmetries in Small-Scale Fisheries: a Barrier to Governance Transformability? , 2010 .

[31]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .