A vulnerability analysis of the temperate forests of south central Chile

Areas of the landscape that are priorities for conservation should be those that are both vulnerable to threatening processes and that if lost or degraded, will result in conservation targets being compromised. While much attention is directed towards understanding the patterns of biodiversity, much less is given to determining the areas of the landscape most vulnerable to threats. We assessed the relative vulnerability of remaining areas of native forest to conversion to plantations in the ecologically significant temperate rainforest region of south central Chile. The area of the study region is 4.2 million ha and the extent of plantations is approximately 200000 ha. First, the spatial distribution of native forest conversion to plantations was determined. The variables related to the spatial distribution of this threatening process were identified through the development of a classification tree and the generation of a multivariate. spatially explicit, statistical model. The model of native forest conversion explained 43% of the deviance and the discrimination ability of the model was high. Predictions were made of where native forest conversion is likely to occur in the future. Due to patterns of climate, topography, soils and proximity to infrastructure and towns, remaining forest areas differ in their relative risk of being converted to plantations. Another factor that may increase the vulnerability of remaining native forest in a subset of the study region is the proposed construction of a highway. We found that 90% of the area of existing plantations within this region is within 2.5 km of roads. When the predictions of native forest conversion were recalculated accounting for the construction of this highway, it was found that: approximately 27000 ha of native forest had an increased probability of conversion. The areas of native forest identified to be vulnerable to conversion are outside of the existing reserve network. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All tights reserved.

[1]  E. Lambin,et al.  Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model , 2001 .

[2]  P. Walker,et al.  HABITAT : a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species , 1991 .

[3]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Bosques templados de la Cordillera de la Costa , 1996 .

[4]  H. Mooney,et al.  Earth system responses to global change: contrasts between North and South America. , 1993 .

[5]  Steven A. Sader,et al.  Deforestation rates and trends in Costa Rica, 1940 to 1983 , 1988 .

[6]  F. Kienast,et al.  Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment , 1998 .

[7]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[8]  Chile's frontier forests: conserving a global treasure. , 2002 .

[9]  Yelena Ogneva-Himmelberger,et al.  Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data , 2001 .

[10]  R. Lawford,et al.  High-latitude rainforests and associated ecosystems of the West Coast of the Americas: climate, hydrology, ecology and conservation. , 1997 .

[11]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Ecología de los bosques nativos de Chile , 1996 .

[12]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Relaciones fitogeográficas y patrones regionales de riqueza de especies en la flora del bosque lluvioso templado de Sudamérica , 1996 .

[13]  P. Alaback.  Comparative ecology of temperate rainforests of the americas along analogous climatic gradients , 1991 .

[14]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[15]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[16]  K. Do,et al.  Combining non-parametric models with logistic regression: an application to motor vehicle injury data , 2000 .

[17]  A. Mather.  Afforestation : Policies, Planning and Progress , 1992 .

[18]  R. Czaplewski,et al.  Variance approximations for assessments of classification accuracy , 1994 .

[19]  R. G. Pontius,et al.  Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA , 2001 .

[20]  A. Stattersfield,et al.  Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation , 1998 .

[21]  R. Alkemade,et al.  Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis: a non‐parametric approach , 1998 .

[22]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[23]  R. Gil Pontius,et al.  Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA , 2001 .

[24]  Glenn De'ath,et al.  Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for the analysis of complex ecological data , 2000 .

[25]  D. Olson,et al.  The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions , 1998 .

[26]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[27]  W. Baker,et al.  Contribution of Roads to Forest Fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[28]  Gretchen G. Moisen,et al.  Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics , 2002 .

[29]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[30]  A. Grainger.  Controlling Tropical Deforestation , 1995 .

[31]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[32]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[33]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Linear statistical models and related methods , 1984 .

[34]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[35]  B. Lees,et al.  A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system , 1991 .

[36]  J. Carlin,et al.  Bias, prevalence and kappa. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  Steven A. Sader,et al.  Analyzing a forest conversion history database to explore the spatial and temporal characteristics of land cover change in Guatemala's Maya Biosphere Reserve , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[39]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Phytogeographic Relationships and Regional Richness Patterns of the Cool Temperate Rainforest Flora of Southern South America , 1996 .

[40]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists , 1985 .

[41]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon - Spatial disaggregation of diverse deforestation processes , 1997 .

[42]  Nigel Dudley.  Forests in trouble : a review of the status of temperate forests worldwide , 1992 .

[43]  R. C. Maggio,et al.  An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS , 1990 .

[44]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[45]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Conservation Targets in South American Temperate Forests , 1998, Science.

[46]  C. Chatfield.  Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference , 1995 .

[47]  Juan J. Armesto,et al.  Three levels of integrating ecology with the conservation of South American temperate forests: the initiative of the Institute of Ecological Research Chiloé, Chile , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[48]  V. Gerding,et al.  Método de clasificación de sitios para la producción forestal, ejemplo en Chile , 1995 .

[49]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[50]  L. Lohmann,et al.  Pulping the South: Industrial Tree Plantations and the World Paper Economy , 1996 .

[51]  S. Glantz,et al.  Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance , 1990 .

[52]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[53]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[54]  Louis R. Iverson,et al.  Rates and patterns of deforestation in the Philippines: application of geographic information system analysis , 1993 .

[55]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[56]  K. Chomitz,et al.  Roads, land use, and deforestation : a spatial model applied to Belize , 1996 .

[57]  Alexander Strickland Pfaff Talikoff.  What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data , 1996 .

[58]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Measuring and Incorporating Vulnerability into Conservation Planning , 2005, Environmental management.

[59]  W. Cramer,et al.  Special Paper: Modelling Present and Potential Future Ranges of Some European Higher Plants Using Climate Response Surfaces , 1995 .