Comparison of intubation modalities in a simulated cardiac arrest with uninterrupted chest compressions

Background Interruptions in chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation can negatively impact survival. Several new endotracheal intubation (ETI) techniques including video laryngoscopy may allow for ETI with minimal or no interruptions in chest compressions. We sought to determine the impact of three different ETI techniques upon time to intubation (TTI) in a simulated cardiac arrest during uninterrupted chest compression. Methods We performed a randomised crossover study with a convenience sample of emergency physicians using three different ETI techniques: direct laryngoscopy (DL), GlideScope video laryngoscopy (GVL) and GlideScope video laryngoscopy with bougie (GVL-B). Providers performed ETI on a manikin on a hospital bed with concurrent chest compressions. Our primary outcome, TTI, was defined as the time from insertion of the laryngoscope blade until first breath. Given the correlated nature of the data, we used the paired t test to assess the differences in mean TTIs between GVL minus DL and GVL-B minus DL. We also ran the analysis stratified by provider experience. Results We enrolled 20 providers with a median TTI (IQR) by device of: DL 27 s (20.3, 35.4), GVL 20.6 s (17.7, 27.1) and GVL-B 60.1 s (39.1, 99). The mean GVL—DL difference was −10.1 s (−17.9–2.3) while the mean GVL-B—DL difference was 45.6 s (19.8–71.4) (p<0.001). The GVL-B required the greatest TTI across providers of varying experience levels. Conclusions In this simulated model of cardiac arrest with uninterrupted chest compressions, TTI was shorter for GVL than DL while use of the GVL with bougie resulted in longer TTI.

[1]  Mohamud Daya,et al.  Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[2]  J. Sakles,et al.  A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  P. Phrampus,et al.  Simulated rescue airway use by laypersons with scripted telephonic instruction. , 2009, Resuscitation.

[4]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Alternate Airways in the Prehospital Setting (Resource Document to NAEMSP Position Statement) , 2007, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[5]  A. Nishisaki,et al.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in simulated pediatric intubation. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  D. Yealy,et al.  Defining the Learning Curve for Paramedic Student Endotracheal Intubation , 2005, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[7]  K. Stroumpoulis,et al.  Glidescope(®) videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: a randomized cross-over manikin study. , 2011, Resuscitation.

[8]  J. A. Kim,et al.  Comparison of tracheal intubation with the Airway Scope or Clarus Video System in patients with cervical collars , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[9]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  R. Neumar,et al.  Part 9: post-cardiac arrest care: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[11]  J. Carlson,et al.  Impact of stylet use in a simulated difficult airway model. , 2013, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Endotracheal intubation versus supraglottic airway insertion in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2012, Resuscitation.

[13]  C. Callaway,et al.  Variables Associated with Successful Intubation Attempts Using Video Laryngoscopy: A Preliminary Report in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service , 2012, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[14]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Time to invasive airway placement and resuscitation outcomes after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[15]  Charity B. Hope,et al.  GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy in the Simulated Difficult Airway: Bougie vs Standard Stylet , 2010, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  Bentley J Bobrow,et al.  Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[17]  F. Guyette,et al.  Feasibility of Laryngeal Mask Airway Use by Prehospital Personnel in Simulated Pediatric Respiratory Arrest , 2007, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[18]  T. Mort,et al.  Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  Roger D. White,et al.  Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  Hyunggoo Kang,et al.  Tracheal intubation using Macintosh and 2 video laryngoscopes with and without chest compressions. , 2011, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  Jessica Hodgins,et al.  Motion Capture Measures Variability in Laryngoscopic Movement During Endotracheal Intubation: A Preliminary Report , 2012, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[22]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Endotracheal intubation skill acquisition by medical students , 2011, Medical education online.

[23]  J. W. Heitz,et al.  The use of a gum elastic bougie in combination with a videolaryngoscope. , 2005, Journal of clinical anesthesia.