Determination of depth and size of defects in carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic with different methods of pulse thermography

The main advantage of high performance composite material is its exceptional light-weight capability due to individual tailoring of anisotropic fiber lay-up. Its main draw-back is a brittle and complex failure behavior under dynamic loading which requires extensive quality assurance measures and short maintenance intervals. For this reason efficient test methods are required, which not only generate good and reliable results, but are also simple in handling, allow rapid adaptation to different test situations and short measuring times. Especially the knowledge about size and position of a defect is necessary to decide about acceptance or rejection of a structure under investigation. As a promising method for contactless in-line and off-line inspection we used pulsed thermography. For the determination of the depth of the defects we used logarithmic peak second derivative, a widely accepted method. Alternatively an analytical model, describing the adiabatic heating of a solid plate by an instantaneous pulse, was fitted directly to the measurement data. For the determination of defect size four different approaches were investigated and compared with exact values. The measurements were done with continuous carbon-fiber reinforced materials.

[1]  S. Marinetti,et al.  Pulse phase infrared thermography , 1996 .

[2]  Bruce A. Rubadeux,et al.  Reconstruction and enhancement of active thermographic image sequences , 2003 .

[3]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Advances in pulsed thermography , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  X. Maldague Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials by Infrared Thermography , 1993 .

[5]  H. Schürmann Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden , 2005 .

[6]  J. Sun Analysis of Pulsed Thermography Methods for Defect Depth Prediction , 2006 .

[7]  X. Maldaguea,et al.  Advances in Pulsed Phase Thermography , 2001 .

[8]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Infrared thermography processing based on higher-order statistics , 2010 .

[9]  Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo,et al.  Defect depth retrieval from pulsed phase thermographic data on Plexiglas and aluminum samples , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Rectification of depth measurement using pulsed thermography with logarithmic peak second derivative method , 2018 .

[11]  X. Maldague,et al.  New absolute contrast for pulsed thermography , 2002 .

[12]  S. Bourbigot,et al.  Modelling Behaviour of a Carbon Epoxy Composite Exposed to Fire: Part I—Characterisation of Thermophysical Properties , 2017, Materials.

[13]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Nondestructive Testing , 2001 .

[14]  Christopher Duncan Wallbrink,et al.  The effect of size on the quantitative estimation of defect depth in steel structures using lock-in thermography , 2007 .

[15]  Peter Cawley,et al.  A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints , 1988 .

[16]  Nik Rajic,et al.  Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures , 2002 .

[17]  W. Oliferuk,et al.  Use Of Pulsed IR Thermography For Determination Of Size And Depth Of Subsurface Defect Taking Into Account The Shape Of Its Cross-Section Area , 2015 .

[18]  B. Oswald-Tranta Comparative study of thermal contrast and contrast in thermal signal derivatives in pulse thermography , 2017 .

[19]  M. Maj,et al.  Reconstruction of size and depth of simulated defects in austenitic steel plate using pulsed infrared thermography , 2012 .