Organizations confronting the realities of a COVID-19 world find themselves managing challenging and unprecedented demands: redeploying talent, establishing remote workforces, building needed capabilities, propping up distressed supply chains, contributing to humanitarian efforts, choosing among firing/furloughing/ retaining employees, and planning for reopening amid uncertainty. In this context, the crisis has revealed three implications for research and practice on agile and sustainable organizations in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments. First, how to characterize the COVID virus and our response to it is unclear; what is clear is that we were unprepared. Second, despite the rhetoric, too many organizations did not have the capabilities to respond. Saying you are agile does not make it so. Third, the COVID-19 pandemic reveals our community’s silence on structural inequality (e.g., financial, social, and racial). We enabled unethical positions from the safety of our positivistic and supposedly neutral values. As reference, we define organization agility as the capability to make timely, effective, and sustained change when it results in a performance advantage (Worley et al., 2014). Sustainable organizations expand the term “performance” to address the optimization of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes as well as financial results. Since the relative emphasis on these outcomes changes over time and the methods for achieving them change, there is no sustainability without agility (Lawler & Worley, 2011).
[1]
Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.
The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
,
2007
.
[2]
Jim Collins,et al.
Good to Great - (Why Some Companies Make the Leap and others Don't)
,
2009
.
[3]
Manto Gotsi,et al.
Structural ambidexterity and competency traps: Insights from Xerox PARC
,
2017
.
[4]
M. Merry.
Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership
,
2004
.
[5]
A. Tsui.
Responsible Research and Responsible Leadership Studies
,
2019
.
[6]
K. Cashman.
Leadership from the Inside Out: Becoming a Leader for Life
,
1998
.
[7]
S. Winter.
Understanding dynamic capabilities
,
2003
.
[8]
Gordon Walker,et al.
Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap–And Others Don't
,
2006
.
[9]
James R Cook.
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
,
2014
.
[10]
A. Meyer.
Adapting to environmental jolts.
,
1982,
Administrative science quarterly.
[11]
Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.
Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy
,
2016
.
[12]
Marianne W. Lewis.
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide
,
2000
.
[13]
Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.
Useful Research: Advancing Theory and Practice
,
2011
.