Comparing Future Autonomous Electric Taxis With an Existing Free-Floating Carsharing System

When considering autonomous mobility on demand (AMoD) trends, it is probably safe to assume that they will have a large market share in the near future. In the introductory phases, users of current non-autonomous mobility on demand services such as ride-hailing and carsharing are expected to be among the first users of AMoD systems. The research presented in this paper aims to estimate fares for an AMoD system in this early stages based on rental and financial data provided by a free-floating CS provider. It demonstrates that an autonomous taxi (aTaxi) model requires less vehicles to serve the same demand resulting in the possibility to lower fares. In our model, user behavior is represented by defining three maximal waiting times and three monetary values reflecting their dissatisfaction in the case, where they cannot be served in due time. Two bipartite optimization problems for vehicle-to-user and relocation assignments build the core of the introduced aTaxi model. Fleet size and relocation parameters are chosen according to a utility function representing profit and opportunity costs of users not being served. We compute the reduction in fares to break-even with the current CS profit. Results of a case-study in Munich, Germany, indicate that one aTaxi can replace 2.8–3.7 CS vehicles. The aTaxi operator can therefore reduce fares by 29%–35% to achieve the same profit assuming the same cost structures as in free-floating CS.

[1]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Non-myopic vehicle and route selection in dynamic DARP with travel time and workload objectives , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: a unified framework , 2012, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[4]  Simone Weikl,et al.  Relocation Strategies and Algorithms for Free-Floating Car Sharing Systems , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[5]  Joseph Ying Jun Chow,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic Itinerary Interception Refueling Location Problem with Queue Delay for Electric Taxi Charging Stations , 2014 .

[6]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Comparing Optimal Relocation Operations With Simulated Relocation Policies in One-Way Carsharing Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Simone Weikl,et al.  A practice-ready relocation model for free-floating carsharing systems with electric vehicles – Mesoscopic approach and field trial results , 2015 .

[8]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet for Austin, Texas, Market , 2015 .

[9]  Amedeo R. Odoni,et al.  Inferring Unmet Demand from Taxi Probe Data , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Simone Weikl,et al.  Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case , 2015 .

[11]  R. Jayakrishnan,et al.  Dynamic Shared‐Taxi Dispatch Algorithm with Hybrid‐Simulated Annealing , 2016, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[12]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Estimated Bounds and Important Factors for Fuel Use and Consumer Costs of Connected and Automated Vehicles , 2016 .

[13]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Shared-Vehicle Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Fleet Operator's Guide to Rebalancing Empty Vehicles , 2016 .

[14]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation , 2017, Transportation.

[15]  Joseph Ying Jun Chow,et al.  Non-myopic Relocation of Idle Mobility-on-Demand Vehicles as a Dynamic Location-Allocation-Queueing Problem , 2017 .

[16]  Klaus Bogenberger,et al.  Microsimulation of an autonomous taxi-system in Munich , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[17]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Taxonomy of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Management Problems to Inform Future Transportation Mobility , 2017 .

[18]  Klaus Bogenberger,et al.  Booking Behavior of Free-Floating Carsharing Users , 2017 .

[19]  Z. Wadud Fully automated vehicles: A cost of ownership analysis to inform early adoption , 2017 .

[20]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services , 2017 .

[21]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Fleet control algorithms for automated mobility: A simulation assessment for Zurich , 2017 .