The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices to experts' errors

Recent studies have shown that many subject-verb agreement errors consist of making the verb agree with the immediately preceding noun, as in “The smell of the rubbish-bins are foul”. Assuming that it is the automaticity of the agreement operation which is responsible for these attraction errors in expert writers, the present studies aimed at demonstrating the gradual automatization of this operation in young writers by examining developmental changes in the occurrence of agreement errors. In three experiments we found that subjects' performance moves from systematic errors in number agreement in young children (e.g., no use of plural marks) to attraction errors in fifth graders and older adults through an intermediate phase characterized by an attention-demanding and easily disrupted computation of verb agreement displayed by some second graders. Attraction errors are a byproduct of the automatization of the implementation of the agreement process.

[1]  Michel Fayol,et al.  Les erreurs d'accord sujet-verbe en production écrite , 1996 .

[2]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[3]  Michel Fayol,et al.  Automatisme et contrôle dans la production écrite : les erreurs d'accord sujet verbe chez l'enfant et l'adulte , 1991 .

[4]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[5]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? , 1991 .

[6]  E. Spelke,et al.  Numerical abstraction by human infants , 1990, Cognition.

[7]  Carolyn B. Mervis,et al.  Acquisition of the plural morpheme : a case study , 1991 .

[8]  P. Largy,et al.  The Homophone Effect in Written French: The Case of Verb-Noun Inflection Errors. , 1996 .

[9]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Terrence J. Kenney,et al.  The Acquisition of Agreement in English. , 1972 .

[11]  Michel Hupet,et al.  Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing , 1998 .

[12]  G. Logan.  Automaticity, Resources, and Memory: Theoretical Controversies and Practical Implications , 1988, Human factors.

[13]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[14]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement , 1993 .

[15]  Lucile Chanquoy,et al.  Subject-verb agreement errors in written productions: A study of French children and adults , 1996 .

[16]  G. Jarema,et al.  Impairment of inflectional morphology and lexical storage , 1992, Brain and Language.

[17]  N. Ellis,et al.  On the development of lexical and non-lexical spelling procedures of French-speaking, normal and disabled children. , 1994 .

[18]  François Ters,et al.  L'échelle Dubois-Buyse d'orthographe usuelle française , 1970 .

[19]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .

[20]  C. Cazden.  The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. , 1968, Child development.

[21]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[22]  K. Bock.  Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[23]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: II. Are there practice effects after automaticity is achieved? , 1991 .

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[25]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[26]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Child's Understanding of Number , 1979 .

[27]  J. Anderson,et al.  Automaticity and the ACT* theory. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[28]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[29]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory , 1990 .