Role of psychological background in cancer susceptibility genetic testing distress: It is not only about a positive result

Clinical and familial factors predict psychological distress after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. However, the contribution of an individual's psychological background to such distress is unclear. This study aims to analyze the psychological impact of genetic testing and to identify the profile of individuals at higher risk. This is a longitudinal multicenter study of individuals undergoing genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Demographic, clinical, genetic, familial, and psychological (personality types, cancer worry) characteristics were assessed by validated questionnaires the day of genetic testing. Distress, uncertainty, and positive experience perception (MICRA scale) were evaluated at the results disclosure visit, and 3 and 12 months afterwards. Multivariate analysis was performed. A total of 714 individuals were included. A high neuroticism score, high baseline cancer worry, and a positive genetic test result were independently associated with higher psychological impact (p-value < 0.05). The highest risk profile (10% of the cohort) included women with high level of neuroticism and a positive result. Uncertainty was mainly associated with a high level of neuroticism, regardless of the genetic test result. A holistic approach to personalized germline genetic counseling should include the assessment of personality dimensions.

[1]  E. Morris,et al.  Examining the effect of patient personality types and coping styles on outcomes of genetic counseling , 2022, Journal of genetic counseling.

[2]  James M. Hodge,et al.  A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients , 2020, Cancer.

[5]  Adam W. Hanley,et al.  Mindfulness training reduces neuroticism over a 6-year longitudinal randomized control trial in Norwegian medical and psychology students , 2019, Journal of Research in Personality.

[6]  C. Lázaro,et al.  Opportunistic testing of BRCA1, BRCA2 and mismatch repair genes improves the yield of phenotype driven hereditary cancer gene panels , 2019, International journal of cancer.

[7]  H. Friedman.  Neuroticism and Health as Individuals Age , 2019, Personality disorders.

[8]  M. Pérez-Fuentes,et al.  Personality and the Moderating Effect of Mood on a Verbal Aggressiveness Risk Factor from Work Activities , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[9]  J. Cubiella,et al.  Psychological impact of multigene cancer panel testing in patients with a clinical suspicion of hereditary cancer across Spain , 2018, Psycho-oncology.

[10]  W. Chung,et al.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, JAMA.

[11]  T. Widiger,et al.  Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications , 2017, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[12]  Mary M. Morris,et al.  Neuroticism's susceptibility to distress: Moderated with mindfulness , 2017 .

[13]  Mark E. Robson,et al.  Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Irum Naqvi,et al.  Personality Traits and Communication Styles Among University Students , 2016 .

[15]  W. Pirl,et al.  Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing , 2015, Cancer.

[16]  W. Chung,et al.  Development of a tiered and binned genetic counseling model for informed consent in the era of multiplex testing for cancer susceptibility , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  I. Blanco,et al.  [Spanish version of the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS). Cross cultural adaptation and validity and reliability analysis]. , 2011, Medicina clínica (Ed. impresa).

[19]  B. Lahey,et al.  Public health significance of neuroticism. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[20]  R. McCrae,et al.  The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits , 2007 .

[21]  J. A. Cruzado,et al.  APLICACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO MULTIDIMENSIONAL DEL IMPACTO DE LA EVALUACIÓN DE RIESGO DE CÁNCER (MICRA), EN UNA MUESTRA ESPAÑOLA , 2005 .