The Practical Turn

What is "practice theory"? The best short answer is that it is any theory that treats practice as a fundamental category, or takes practices as its point of departure . Naturally, this answer leads to further questions . What is meant by "practices" here? What is involved in taking practices as a point of departure or a fundamental category, and what does that commitment amount to? And what is the point of the contrast between a practice-based theory and one that starts elsewhere? Perhaps the most significant point of agreement among those who have taken the practical turn is that it offers a way out of Procustean yet seemingly inescapable categories, such as subject and object, representation and represented, conceptual scheme and content, belief and desire, structure and action, rules and their application, micro and macro, individual and totality . Instead, practice theorists propose that we start with practices and rethink our theories from the ground up. Bourdieu, for instance, insists that only a theory of practice can open up a way forward :

[1]  S. Blackburn The individual strikes back , 1984, Synthese.

[2]  D. Stern The Methods of the Tractatus:: Beyond Positivism and Metaphysics? , 2003 .

[3]  Anthony King,et al.  Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus , 2000 .

[4]  Alex Preda Order with Things? Humans, Artifacts, and the Sociological Problem of Rule-Following , 2000 .

[5]  H. Dreyfus Appropriating Heidegger: Could anything be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility? Reinterpreting division I of Being and Time in the light of division II , 2000 .

[6]  M. Friedman On the sociology of scientific knowledge and its philosophical agenda , 1998 .

[7]  S. Turner Bad Practices: A Reply , 1997 .

[8]  A. Pickering Time and a Theory of the Visible , 1997 .

[9]  S. Fuller Why Practice Does Not Make Perfect: Some Additional Support for Turner‘s Social Theory of Practices , 1997 .

[10]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[11]  P. Roth What does the sociology of scientific knowledge explain?: or, when epistemological chickens come home to roost , 1994 .

[12]  R. Rorty Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the reification of language , 1993 .

[13]  H. Kellner Language and Historical Representation , 1989 .

[14]  Sherry B. Ortner Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties , 1984, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[15]  S. Shapin History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions , 1982 .

[16]  H. Dreyfus Holism and Hermeneutics , 1980 .

[17]  David Bloor,et al.  Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics , 1973 .