Transferability and robustness of real-time freeway crash risk assessment.

INTRODUCTION This study examines the data from single loop detectors on northbound (NB) US-101 in San Jose, California to estimate real-time crash risk assessment models. METHOD The classification tree and neural network based crash risk assessment models developed with data from NB US-101 are applied to data from the same freeway, as well as to the data from nearby segments of the SB US-101, NB I-880, and SB I-880 corridors. The performance of crash risk assessment models on these nearby segments is the focus of this research. RESULTS The model applications show that it is in fact possible to use the same model for multiple freeways, as the underlying relationships between traffic data and crash risk remain similar. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY The framework provided here may be helpful to authorities for freeway segments with newly installed traffic surveillance apparatuses, since the real-time crash risk assessment models from nearby freeways with existing infrastructure would be able to provide a reasonable estimate of crash risk. The robustness of the model output is also assessed by location, time of day, and day of week. The analysis shows that on some locations the models may require further learning due to higher than expected false positive (e.g., the I-680/I-280 interchange on US-101 NB) or false negative rates. The approach for post-processing the results from the model provides ideas to refine the model prior to or during the implementation.

[1]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[2]  Chengcheng Xu,et al.  Exploration and Identification of Hazardous Traffic Flow States before Crash Occurrences on Freeways , 2011 .

[3]  Michael Georgiopoulos,et al.  Applications of Neural Networks in Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[4]  Frank F Saccomanno,et al.  Proactive freeway crash prevention using real-time traffic control , 2003 .

[5]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[6]  T. Golob,et al.  A Method for Relating Type of Crash to Traffic Flow Characteristics on Urban Freeways , 2002 .

[7]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Relationship between Real-Time Traffic Surveillance Data and Rear-End Crashes on Freeways , 2006 .

[8]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Estimation of Real-Time Crash Risk , 2011 .

[9]  Pravin P Varaiya Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS), PeMS 7.0 , 2007 .

[10]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Bayesian random effect models incorporating real-time weather and traffic data to investigate mountainous freeway hazardous factors. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Okyay Kaynak,et al.  An algorithm for fast convergence in training neural networks , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[12]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessing Safety on Dutch Freeways with Data from Infrastructure-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2008 .

[13]  Moinul Hossain,et al.  Evaluating Location of Placement and Spacing of Detectors for Real-Time Crash Prediction on Urban Expressways , 2010 .

[14]  Matthew G Karlaftis,et al.  Identifying crash type propensity using real-time traffic data on freeways. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Anurag Pande,et al.  A Computing Approach Using Probabilistic Neural Networks for Instantaneous Appraisal of Rear‐End Crash Risk , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..