Cross-Linguistic Cognitive Modeling of Verbal Morphology Acquisition

How children acquire and process inflectional morphology is still an open question. Despite the fact that English past tense acquisition has been studied and modeled in depth, the current approaches do not account for many of the errors made by humans. Moreover, not much work has been done with highly inflected languages, like Spanish. However, the modeling of any linguistic phenomenon in different languages is very important in order to understand the general cognitive processes underlying each particular phenomenon. This paper presents an ACT-R dual-mechanism model that accomplishes the task of acquiring verbal morphology systems from one of the simplest systems (the English one) to one of the most complex systems (the Spanish one), by using a double analogy process of stem and suffix. The model proposed was able to match all types of errors that developing children make (from a sample of them), both in English and Spanish. The models for both languages used very similar parameters. The introduced approach not only shows how children could acquire a highly inflected morphology system in terms of dual-mechanism theories but, given its cross-linguistic character, also sheds light on the possible general processes involved in the acquisition and processing of inflectional morphology.

[1]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[2]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  A cross-linguistic model of the acquisition of inflectional morphology in English and modern Greek , 2010 .

[3]  I. Bosque,et al.  Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española , 1999 .

[4]  V. Marchman,et al.  From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.

[5]  Silvina Andrea Montrul,et al.  The acquisition of Spanish , 2004 .

[6]  Michal VavreckaIgor A Multimodal Connectionist Architecture for Unsupervised Grounding of Spatial Language , 2014 .

[7]  Andrew Radford,et al.  The morphosyntax of subjects and verbs in child Spanish: a case study , 1995 .

[8]  Artem Kaznatcheev,et al.  A Connectionist Study on the Interplay of Nouns and Pronouns in Personal Pronoun Acquisition , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[9]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Constraints on Generalization: Why are past-tense irregularization errors so rare? , 2003 .

[11]  M. Ullman A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Steven Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism , 1988 .

[13]  John R. Anderson A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory , 1988 .

[14]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[16]  Gert Westermann,et al.  A single-mechanism dual-route model of German verb inflection , 2008 .

[17]  Per Durst-Andersen What Languages Tell Us About the Structure of the Human Mind , 2011, Cognitive Computation.

[18]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[19]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[20]  Marco Mazzone,et al.  First Words Learning: A Cortical Model , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[21]  F. Pina Teorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna , 1985 .

[22]  B. MacWhinney A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  Jayant Krishnamurthy,et al.  Jointly Learning to Parse and Perceive: Connecting Natural Language to the Physical World , 2013, TACL.

[24]  M. Maratsos More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  ‘Words or Rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  S Pinker,et al.  Weird past tense forms , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Pentti O. A. Haikonen,et al.  The Role of Associative Processing in Cognitive Computing , 2009, Cognitive Computation.

[28]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[29]  B. MacWhinney The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Volume II: the Database , 2000 .

[30]  Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al.  Why girls say 'holded' more than boys. , 2006, Developmental science.

[31]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Semantic Density and Past-Tense Formation in Three Germanic Languages , 2005 .

[32]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback , 2002, Cognition.

[33]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[34]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[35]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Extending the Past-tense Debate: a Model of the German Plural - eScholarship , 2001 .

[36]  Estevam R. Hruschka,et al.  Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning , 2010, AAAI.

[37]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Response to Carreiras et al: The role of visual similarity, feedforward, feedback and lateral pathways in reading , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Bartjan Hollebrandse RESEARCH ON CHILD LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, VOLS 1 AND 2 , 2001 .

[39]  David Eddington,et al.  Spanish verbal inflection: a single- or dual-route system? , 2009 .

[40]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[41]  Ángel Iglesias,et al.  Cognitive Modeling of the Acquisition of a Highly Inflected Verbal System , 2010 .

[42]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .

[44]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model , 1991, Cognition.

[45]  José Javier Aguado-Orea,et al.  The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish : implications for current theories of development , 2004 .

[46]  Miren Hodgson,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF SPANISH: MORPHOSYNTACTIC DEVELOPMENT IN MONOLINGUAL AND BILINGUAL L1 ACQUISITION AND ADULT L2 ACQUISITION , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[47]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  E. Bates,et al.  Spoken verb processing in Spanish: An analysis using a new online resource , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[49]  Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole,et al.  The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? , 1999 .

[50]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .