SHU 508 A (Levovist)‐Enhanced Doppler Echocardiography Improves the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease

Objective: To investigate whether intravenous injection of SHU 508 A improves the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of valvular pathologies. Methods and Results: One hundred and twenty‐five consecutive patients with valvular pathology (aortic stenosis, n = 48; aortic regurgitation, n = 20; mitral stenosis, n = 21; and mitral regurgitation, n = 36) and diagnostically insufficient Doppler signal were enrolled in this multicenter study. The severity of valvular pathology was graded on a four‐point scale using unenhanced and contrast‐enhanced Doppler echocardiography as well as cardiac catheterization. Agreement with cardiac catheterization findings increased from 63% using the unenhanced examination to 73% using the contrast‐enhanced Doppler examination. Grading was possible in all patients using SHU 508 A, whereas the unenhanced Doppler examination remained inconclusive in six patients. The weighted kappa coefficient between contrast‐enhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization for all diagnoses was 0.76 as compared to 0.68 between unenhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization. Agreement was especially improved in aortic stenosis (kappa 0.69 unenhanced vs 0.81 contrast‐enhanced) and in aortic regurgitation (kappa 0.45 unenhanced vs 0.75 contrast‐enhanced). Patients with mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation experienced less improvement. Conclusions: In case of an inconclusive unenhanced Doppler echo study, the administration of a left heart contrast agent should be considered. SHU 508 A is especially useful in improving the severity grading of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, while grading of mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation is less improved.

[1]  J. Thomas,et al.  Comparison of transesophageal Doppler methods with angiography for evaluation of the severity of mitral regurgitation. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  H. Tries,et al.  Improvement of pulmonary venous flow Doppler signal after intravenous injection of Levovist. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  L. Shaw,et al.  Impact of contrast echocardiography on diagnostic algorithms: Pharmacoeconomic implications , 1997, Clinical cardiology.

[4]  V. R. McCready,et al.  Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: effect on breast masses. Work in progress. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  G Becker,et al.  Transcranial duplex sonography using ultrasound contrast enhancers. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[6]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Clinical evaluation of left heart Doppler contrast enhancement by a saccharide-based transpulmonary contrast agent. The Levovist Cardiac Working Group. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Doppler enhancement with SH U 508A in multiple vascular regions. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  S. Nakatani,et al.  Efficacy and adverse effects of transpulmonary contrast echocardiography using sonicated albumin. , 1994, Internal medicine.

[9]  R. Schlief,et al.  Enhancement of mitral regurgitation and normal left atrial color Doppler flow signals with peripheral venous injection of a saccharide-based contrast agent. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  S. Nakatani,et al.  Clinical application of transpulmonary contrast-enhanced Doppler technique in the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  H. Stempfle,et al.  Limitations of Flow Detection by Color Doppler: In Vitro Comparison to Conventional Doppler , 1991, Echocardiography.

[12]  R. Schlief,et al.  Echo Contrast Agents Improve Flow Display of Color Doppler: In Vitro Studies , 1991, Echocardiography.

[13]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation by Doppler Color Flow Imaging: Angiographic and Hemodynamic Correlations , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  E. Botvinick,et al.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Circulation.

[15]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Determination of regurgitant fraction in isolated mitral or aortic regurgitation by pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Winniford,et al.  Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[18]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[19]  C. Lillehei,et al.  LEFT RETROGRADE CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY IN ACQUIRED CARDIAC DISEASE: TECHNIC, INDICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS IN 700 CASES. , 1964, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[21]  R. Schlief,et al.  Contrast enhancement in leg vessels. , 1996, Clinical Radiology.