A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries

In this study, a series of relative indicators are used to compare the difference in research performance in biomedical fields between ten selected Western and Asian countries. Based on Thomson’s Essential Science Indicators (ESI) 1996–2006, the output of papers and their citations in ten biomedical fields are compared at multiple levels using relative indicators. Chart diagrams and hierarchical clustering are applied to represent the data. The results confirm that there are many differences in intra- and interdisciplinary scientific activities between the West and the East. In most biomedical fields Asian countries perform below world average.

[1]  Andreas von Bubnoff.  Asia squeezes Europe's lead in science , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The b index as a measure of scientific excellence. A promising supplement to the h index , 2007 .

[3]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  United Germany: The new scientific superpower? , 1990, Scientometrics.

[4]  A. Raan.  Measuring Science: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues , 2004 .

[5]  Jingjing Zhang,et al.  Characterising Nanotechnology Research in China , 2007 .

[6]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators , 2006, Scientometrics.

[7]  Éric Archambault,et al.  Health biotechnology publishing takes-off in developing countries , 2006 .

[8]  Tai-Yue Wang,et al.  The role of technology development in national competitiveness - Evidence from Southeast Asian countries , 2007 .

[9]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[10]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[11]  M. A. Zulueta,et al.  Analysis of biomedical research in Spain , 1995 .

[12]  The returning tide: , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  Nan Ma,et al.  A comparative study of research performance in computer science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[15]  Jonathan Adams.  Benchmarking international research , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Ülle Must,et al.  “New”countries in Europe - Research, development and innovation strategies vs bibliometric data , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Hugo Horta,et al.  Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field , 2007 .

[18]  Leo Egghe,et al.  A general framework for relative impact indicators , 2003 .

[19]  Robert D. Shelton,et al.  The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology: Qualitative and quantitative indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[20]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  China's quantitative expansion phase: exponential growth but low impact , 2005 .

[21]  Joseph G. Eisenhauer.  Regression through the Origin , 2003 .

[22]  Robert D. Shelton,et al.  Do new SCI journals have a different national bias? , 2009, Scientometrics.

[23]  P. Zhou,et al.  The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 2006, 83-104. , 2006, 0911.3421.

[24]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985 , 1989, Scientometrics.

[25]  R. D. Bruin,et al.  A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent , 1993 .

[26]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Challenges for scientometric indicators: data demining, knowledge-flow measurements and diversity issues , 2008 .

[27]  Tibor Braun,et al.  World Flash on Basic Research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[28]  Kwanghui Lim.  The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997) , 2004 .

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[30]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world , 2008, Scientometrics.

[31]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Relative Superiority Coefficient of papers: A new dimension for institutional research performance in different fields , 2007, Scientometrics.

[32]  Ray Wu,et al.  Making an impact , 2004, Nature.