L2 anti-windup for linear dead-time systems

In this paper we address and solve the problem of antiwindup augmentation for linear systems with input and output delay. In particular, we give a formal definition of the anti-windup construction problem in the global, local, robust and nominal cases. For each of these cases we show that a specific anti-windup compensation structure (which is a generalization of the approach in 131) is capable of solving the anti-windup problem whenever this is solvable. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme is shown on a simple example taken from the literature, in which the plant is a marginally stable linear system The anti-windup design problem has been qualitatively stated already from the 1950's both in the analog and in the digital control framework. However, the arisin solutions were at that time mainly application oriente! and not applicable to large classes of control systems. It was only in the 1980's that some design techniques ap plicable to large classes of control systems were formalized, although the issue of performance characterization and improvement was still mostly unsolved. An interestin survey of these techniques can be found in 141. Anotier Dhenomenon that is often found in coninnction

[1]  Hyuk Lim,et al.  Anti-windup compensator for active queue management in TCP networks , 2003 .

[2]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Nonlinear L 2 Anti-Windup Design: An LMI-Based Approach , 2001 .

[3]  A. Teel,et al.  The L2 anti-winup problem: Its definition and solution , 1997, 1997 European Control Conference (ECC).

[4]  D. P. Atherton,et al.  Modified Smith predictor and controller for processes with time delay , 1999 .

[5]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Conditioning technique, a general anti-windup and bumpless transfer method , 1987, Autom..

[6]  A. Teel,et al.  Establishing Lipschitz properties of multivariable algebraic loops with incremental sector nonlinearities , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[7]  Eduardo Sontag An algebraic approach to bounded controllability of linear systems , 1984 .

[8]  Lars Rundqwist,et al.  Integrator Windup and How to Avoid It , 1989, 1989 American Control Conference.

[9]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs , 2002, Autom..

[10]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[11]  J. Lozier,et al.  A steady state approach to the theory of saturable servo systems , 1956 .

[12]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Multivariable anti-windup controller synthesis using linear matrix inequalities , 2001, Autom..

[13]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  L 2 Anti-Windup Via Receding Horizon Optimal Control , 2002 .

[14]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  L/sub 2/ anti-windup via receding horizon optimal control , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[15]  L2 performance induced by feedbacks with multiple saturations , 1996 .

[16]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  High performance anti-windup for robot manipulators , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  Leang-San Shieh,et al.  Optimal digital redesign of hybrid cascaded input-delay systems under state and control constraints , 2002 .

[18]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Dynamic anti-windup method for a class of time-delay control systems with input saturation , 2000 .

[19]  Jang Gyu Lee,et al.  Robust control of uncertain systems with input delay and input sector nonlinearity , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[20]  O. J. M. Smith,et al.  A controller to overcome dead time , 1959 .

[21]  Jing-Chung Shen,et al.  Stabilization of input-delay systems with saturating actuator , 1989 .

[22]  D. P. Atherton,et al.  An analysis package comparing PID anti-windup strategies , 1995 .

[23]  Matthew C. Turner,et al.  Antiwindup for stable linear systems with input saturation: an LMI-based synthesis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[24]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Results on anti-windup design for Euler-Lagrange systems , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[25]  M. Safonov,et al.  Robustness of interconnected systems with controller saturation and bounded delays , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[26]  Manfred Morari,et al.  A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs , 1994, Autom..

[27]  Sophie Tarbouriech,et al.  Delay-Dependent Anti-Windup Loops for Enlarging the Stability Region of Time Delay Systems With Saturating Inputs , 2003 .

[28]  Max Donath,et al.  American Control Conference , 1993 .

[29]  A. Megretski,et al.  L 2 Bibo Output Feedback Stabilization With Saturated Control , 1996 .

[30]  Sabine Mondié,et al.  Global asymptotic stabilization for chains of integrators with a delay in the input , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[31]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  On improving time-delay control under certain hard nonlinearities , 2003 .

[32]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Multivariable Anti-windup Controller Synthesis Using Bilinear Matrix Inequalities , 2000, Eur. J. Control.

[33]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  Anti-windup synthesis via sampled-data piecewise affine optimal control , 2004, Autom..

[34]  Alex Zheng,et al.  Anti-windup design for internal model control , 1994 .