Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: The student perspective.

This study used a 2×2×2 factorial experiment to examine student satisfaction with eight processes of collecting student ratings of instruction by varying a) method (group interviews vs. individual standardized rating forms), b) timing (midterm vs. end of course), and c) amount of instructor reaction to student ratings (restricted vs. extended)

[1]  J. Friedlander.  Student Perceptions on the Effectiveness of Midterm Feedback to Modify College Instruction. , 1978 .

[2]  L. Braskamp,et al.  Congruency of Student Evaluation Information Collected by Three Methods. , 1980 .

[3]  Michael T. Kane,et al.  The Generalizability of Student Ratings of Instruction: Estimation of the Teacher and Course Components. , 1978 .

[4]  Using Qualitative Methods to Generate Data for Instructional Development , 1986 .

[5]  Vivian Edmiston.  The Group Interview , 1944 .

[6]  Kenneth N. Cissna,et al.  Patterns of Interactional Confirmation and Disconfirmation , 1981 .

[7]  John C. Ory,et al.  Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: A Practical Guide , 1984 .

[8]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings , 1980 .

[9]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interaction: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses on interpersonal attraction. , 1979 .

[10]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[11]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[12]  Peter Seldin,et al.  Changing practices in faculty evaluation , 1985 .

[13]  R. A. Wicklund.  Freedom and reactance , 1974 .

[14]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Midterm feedback from students: Its relationship to instructional improvement and students' cognitive and affective outcomes. , 1979 .