Range- and azimuth-dependent variability of image texture in two-dimensional echocardiograms.

Regional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic amplitude patterns, or image texture, may be of diagnostic importance. Echocardiographic image texture is due in part to acoustic speckle, a complex pattern of interference of reflections from many small scatterers in tissue. The regional speckle pattern appears to be altered in several disorders associated with abnormalities in myocardial structure but also may be altered by a variety of characteristics of the scanning instrument. We hypothesized that quantitative measures of regional 2D echocardiographic image texture would vary as a function of position in range and azimuth within the field of view, even when imaging a uniform ensemble of scatterers. We tested this hypothesis by imaging a tissue-equivalent phantom with two phased-array scanners and two different methods of digitization. We analyzed the texture in several regions of interest separated in range and azimuth and found significant differences in quantitative texture measures as a function of position of the region of interest in the sector field of view (p values .006 to .0001 by multivariate analysis of variance). We found significant regional variability in texture with both scanners and both methods of digitization. We conclude that regional quantitative image texture in 2D echocardiograms varies as a function of range and azimuth, even when imaging a uniform ensemble of scatterers. This variability is related to several physical and instrument-related phenomena and precludes interpreting all regional texture alterations as indicating tissue structural abnormalities.

[1]  G. Devey,et al.  Ultrasound in medical diagnosis. , 1978, Scientific American.

[2]  H. E. Melton Parallel-Focusing and Speckle Reduction in Medical Ultrasonic Imaging , 1980 .

[3]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Textural Variations in B-Mode Ultrasonography: A Stochastic Model , 1981 .

[4]  R. A. Banjavic,et al.  A new ultrasound tissue-equivalent material. , 1980, Radiology.

[5]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[6]  T Kobayashi Review: ultrasonic diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1975, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  F L Thurstone,et al.  Acoustic speckle: theory and experimental analysis. , 1979, Ultrasonic imaging.

[8]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[10]  D. Carpenter,et al.  Grey scale echography in the diagnosis of intrahepatic disease , 1973, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[11]  R. N. Macsween,et al.  Computer analysis of ultrasonic signals in diffuse liver disease. , 1979, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  J. French,et al.  Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis Viewed by Wide-Angle, Phased-Array Echocardiography , 1979, Circulation.

[13]  J. Seward,et al.  M‐mode and Two‐dimensional Echocardiographic Features in Cardiac Amyloidosis , 1981, Circulation.

[14]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Quantitative texture analysis in two-dimensional echocardiography: application to the diagnosis of experimental myocardial contusion. , 1983, Circulation.

[15]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[16]  G. Kossoff,et al.  Principles and classification of soft tissues by grey scale echography. , 1976, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.