The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading.

Studies have shown that displacing specular highlights from their natural locations in images reduces perceived surface gloss. Here, we assessed the extent to which perceived gloss depends on congruence in the position and orientation of specular highlights relative to surface shape and the diffuse shading from which surface shape is recovered. The position and orientation congruence of specular highlights with diffuse shading was altered while preserving their compatibility with physical surface shape (Experiment 1). We found that perceived gloss diminished as the position of highlights became incompatible wit h the surface's global diffuse shading maxima. In a subsequent experiment, we constrained highlight proximity near the global luminance maxima in diffuse shading. When we disrupted the consistency in the local position and orientation of specular highlights with respect to the diffuse shading and local surface meso-structure, a decline in perceived gloss was still observed (Experiment 2). This decline in perceived gloss caused by misaligning the positions and orientations of specular highlights relative to diffuse surface shading could not be explained by differences in orientation fields alone (Experiments 3 and 4). These results suggest the visual system assesses both position and orientation congruence between specular highlights and diffuse shading to estimate surface gloss.

[1]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Photometric Invariants Related to Solid Shape , 1980 .

[2]  J. Beck,et al.  Highlights and the perception of glossiness , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? , 1990, Nature.

[4]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Shadows and shading flow fields , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  On the perceptual organization of texture and shading flows: from a geometrical model to coherence computation , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[7]  Paul E. Debevec,et al.  Image-based lighting , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  A. Torralba,et al.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[9]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Lightness Constancy in the Presence of Specular Highlights , 2004, Psychological science.

[10]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[11]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Rapid Classification of Surface Reflectance from Image Velocities , 2009, CAIP.

[14]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Shape from Sheen , 2009 .

[15]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[16]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[17]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Distinguishing shiny from matte , 2010 .

[18]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Rapid classification of specular and diffuse reflection from image velocities , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. , 2011, Journal of vision.