Multi-approach evaluations of a cascade-Organic Rankine Cycle (C-ORC) system driven by diesel engine waste heat: Part A – Thermodynamic evaluations

A novel transcritical cascade-Organic Rankine Cycle (C-ORC) system was proposed for recovering multi-grade waste heat from a typical heavy-duty diesel engine. The C-ORC comprises a high temperature ORC loop (HT-Loop) and a low temperature ORC loop (LT-Loop) for recovering waste heat from engine exhaust gas (EG), exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), jacket water (JW) and charge air (CA) in a cascaded pattern. The basic thermodynamic evaluation on energy and exergy aspects were covered in the companion piece-‘Part A-thermodynamic evaluations’, indicating that the proposed C-ORC possesses great heat-recovery capacities and efficiency-promotion potentials. The techno-economic evaluations in Part B of this paper will further explore the performance of the C-ORC system based on costs and benefits in order to reveal its practical benefits. Four techno-economic indexes are mainly focused on: component-to-system cost ratio (CSCR), electricity production cost (EPC), depreciated payback period (DPP) and savings-to-investment ratio (SIR). Under rated engine conditions, working fluids were initially compared to find the most economical fluids for the HT-Loop and the LT-Loop respectively. Results indicated that toluene and R143a still make the perfect match for the C-ORC with the lowest EPC (0.27 Dollar/kW h), DPP (7.8 years) and the highest SIR (1.6). As to component-to-system cost ratio (CSCR), the cost of expanders and heat exchangers together account for more than 3/4 of the total system cost, and the expander of the LT-Loop is the most costly single component. The C-ORC’s techno-economic performance was further evaluated based on engine’s practical operating conditions. Results showed that, under available conditions, the CSCR of expanders is within 25.9–48.0%, and it gradually increases as engine’s speed and torque increase; the CSCRs of heat exchangers and pumps are within 31.1–54.8% and 17.7–22.5% respectively. The EPC, DPP and SIR are within 0.27–0.48 Dollar/kW h, 8.5–20.5 years and 0.85–1.6 respectively, and according to their similar variations, an increase in engine speed will evidently benefit three indexes. In addition, the increasing torque will also improve the indexes to some extent. Summarily, the techno-economic evaluations in Part B of this paper further reveal the C-ORC’s merits and drawbacks, and in order to improve its full performance, provide directions for optimizations for higher system capacities and commercial potentials.

[1]  Gael D. Ulrich,et al.  A Guide to Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics , 1984 .

[2]  François Maréchal,et al.  Performance and economic optimization of an organic rankine cycle for a gasoline hybrid pneumatic powertrain , 2015 .

[3]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles , 2011 .

[4]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Improving Fuel Economy for HD Diesel Engines with WHR Rankine Cycle Driven by EGR Cooler Heat Rejection , 2009 .

[5]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) of diesel engine (DE) , 2013 .

[6]  Christoph Wieland,et al.  Economic comparison of ORC (Organic Rankine cycle) processes at different scales , 2014 .

[7]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  Thermoeconomic comparison between pure and mixture working fluids of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[8]  P. A. Pilavachi,et al.  Economic evaluation of energy saving measures in a common type of Greek building , 2009 .

[9]  T. Hung Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids , 2001 .

[10]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Performance analysis of waste heat recovery with a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for diesel engine under various operating conditions , 2014 .

[11]  Richard Turton,et al.  Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes , 2002 .

[12]  Anastassios M. Stamatelos,et al.  Engine exhaust system design based on heat transfer computation , 1999 .

[13]  Christos Katsanos,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a Rankine cycle applied on a diesel truck engine using steam and organic medium , 2012 .

[14]  Denis Clodic,et al.  Combined Cycle for Hybrid Vehicles , 2005 .

[15]  Lisa Branchini,et al.  ORC waste heat recovery in European energy intensive industries: Energy and GHG savings , 2013 .

[16]  Bertrand F. Tchanche,et al.  Low grade heat conversion into power using small scale organic rankine cycles. , 2010 .

[17]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids , 2008 .

[18]  Igor Pioro,et al.  Heat transfer to supercritical fluids flowing in channels—empirical correlations (survey) , 2004 .

[19]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems , 2013 .

[20]  V. Zare,et al.  A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants , 2015 .

[21]  Gequn Shu,et al.  A Multi-Approach Evaluation System (MA-ES) of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) used in waste heat utilization , 2014 .

[22]  T. Shedd,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from an Internal Combustion Engine in a Hybrid Vehicle , 2006 .

[23]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) , 2012 .

[24]  Raymond Freymann,et al.  The turbosteamer: A system introducing the principle of cogeneration in automotive applications , 2008 .

[25]  Sotirios Karellas,et al.  Energy–exergy analysis and economic investigation of a cogeneration and trigeneration ORC–VCC hybrid system utilizing biomass fuel and solar power , 2016 .

[26]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Comparative study of alternative ORC-based combined power systems to exploit high temperature waste heat , 2015 .

[27]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Integrated system approach for increase of engine combined cycle efficiency , 2012 .

[28]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Evaluation of the potential use of a combined micro-turbine organic Rankine cycle for different geographic locations , 2013 .

[29]  Steven Lecompte,et al.  Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system , 2013 .

[30]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[31]  Ki-Chang Chang,et al.  A comparative study of power optimization in low-temperature geothermal heat source driven R125 transcritical cycle and HFC organic Rankine cycles , 2011 .

[32]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization , 2014 .

[33]  Giovanna Cavazzini,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility study of the integration of a commercial small-scale ORC in a real case study , 2015 .