Canalization and Control in Automata Networks: Body Segmentation in Drosophila melanogaster

We present schema redescription as a methodology to characterize canalization in automata networks used to model biochemical regulation and signalling. In our formulation, canalization becomes synonymous with redundancy present in the logic of automata. This results in straightforward measures to quantify canalization in an automaton (micro-level), which is in turn integrated into a highly scalable framework to characterize the collective dynamics of large-scale automata networks (macro-level). This way, our approach provides a method to link micro- to macro-level dynamics – a crux of complexity. Several new results ensue from this methodology: uncovering of dynamical modularity (modules in the dynamics rather than in the structure of networks), identification of minimal conditions and critical nodes to control the convergence to attractors, simulation of dynamical behaviour from incomplete information about initial conditions, and measures of macro-level canalization and robustness to perturbations. We exemplify our methodology with a well-known model of the intra- and inter cellular genetic regulation of body segmentation in Drosophila melanogaster. We use this model to show that our analysis does not contradict any previous findings. But we also obtain new knowledge about its behaviour: a better understanding of the size of its wild-type attractor basin (larger than previously thought), the identification of novel minimal conditions and critical nodes that control wild-type behaviour, and the resilience of these to stochastic interventions. Our methodology is applicable to any complex network that can be modelled using automata, but we focus on biochemical regulation and signalling, towards a better understanding of the (decentralized) control that orchestrates cellular activity – with the ultimate goal of explaining how do cells and tissues ‘compute’.

[1]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  S. Kauffman,et al.  An analysis of the class of gene regulatory functions implied by a biochemical model. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[3]  Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  Multiple-Valued Minimization for PLA Optimization , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[4]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Understanding Modularity in Molecular Networks Requires Dynamics , 2009, Science Signaling.

[5]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Decanalization and the origin of complex disease , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  The role of certain Post classes in Boolean network models of genetic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  The role of genome and gene regulatory network canalization in the evolution of multi-trait polymorphisms and sympatric speciation , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[8]  K. Bassler,et al.  Canalization and symmetry in Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks , 2006, q-bio/0610011.

[9]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Computing Combinatorial Intervention Strategies and Failure Modes in Signaling Networks , 2010, J. Comput. Biol..

[10]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[11]  George J. Klir,et al.  Architecture of Systems Problem Solving , 1985, Springer US.

[12]  D. Irons,et al.  Logical analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  M. Scott,et al.  The molecular genetic basis of positional information in insect segments. , 1992, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[15]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[16]  M Mitchell,et al.  The evolution of emergent computation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Sasha F. Levy,et al.  Network Hubs Buffer Environmental Variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, PLoS biology.

[18]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[19]  George Markowsky,et al.  On the number of prime implicants , 1978, Discret. Math..

[20]  A. Bergman,et al.  Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Eric F Wieschaus,et al.  Cell cycle regulation via inter-nuclear communication during the early embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster , 2010, Cell cycle.

[22]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  S. Kauffman Homeostasis and Differentiation in Random Genetic Control Networks , 1969, Nature.

[24]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  A theory of the learnable , 1984, STOC '84.

[26]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[27]  S. Kauffman Emergent properties in random complex automata , 1984 .

[28]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Complex systems: Network thinking , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[29]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[30]  Réka Albert,et al.  Discrete dynamic modeling with asynchronous update, or how to model complex systems in the absence of quantitative information. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  Jennifer A Zallen,et al.  Patterned gene expression directs bipolar planar polarity in Drosophila. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[32]  Andrew Wuensche,et al.  A model of transcriptional regulatory networks based on biases in the observed regulation rules , 2002, Complex..

[33]  T. Helikar,et al.  Emergent decision-making in biological signal transduction networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Thomas,et al.  Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  L. Raeymaekers,et al.  Dynamics of Boolean networks controlled by biologically meaningful functions. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Prediction and modularity in dynamical systems , 2011, ECAL.

[37]  Andreas Björklund,et al.  Inclusion--Exclusion Algorithms for Counting Set Partitions , 2006, 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06).

[38]  G. Odell,et al.  Design and constraints of the Drosophila segment polarity module: robust spatial patterning emerges from intertwined cell state switches. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[39]  Araceli M. Huerta,et al.  From specific gene regulation to genomic networks: a global analysis of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[41]  M. Conrad The geometry of evolution. , 1990, Bio Systems.

[42]  A. Bergman,et al.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Archie Blake Canonical expressions in Boolean algebra , 1938 .

[44]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Schema redescription in cellular automata: Revisiting emergence in complex systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALIFE).

[45]  Jevin D. West,et al.  Evidence for complex, collective dynamics and emergent, distributed computation in plants , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[46]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Random Boolean network models and the yeast transcriptional network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Robustness and evolvability in genetic regulatory networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  M. Aldana,et al.  Floral Morphogenesis: Stochastic Explorations of a Gene Network Epigenetic Landscape , 2008, PloS one.

[49]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[50]  C. Waddington Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.

[51]  M. Pigliucci Is evolvability evolvable? , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  Edward J. McCluskey,et al.  Detection of group invariance or total symmetry of a Boolean function , 1956 .

[53]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits , 1938, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[54]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Material Representations: From the Genetic Code to the Evolution of Cellular Automata , 2005, Artificial Life.

[56]  Eric E. Schadt,et al.  The Quantitative Genetics of Phenotypic Robustness , 2010, PloS one.

[57]  Ron Shamir,et al.  Chain functions and scoring functions in genetic networks , 2003, ISMB.

[58]  David A.R. Wallace,et al.  Groups, Rings and Fields , 1984 .

[59]  Karem A. Sakallah,et al.  Generalized symmetries in Boolean functions , 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design. ICCAD - 2000. IEEE/ACM Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.00CH37140).

[60]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  A Way to Simplify Truth Functions , 1955 .

[61]  Dorothea Heiss-Czedik,et al.  An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[62]  Archie Blake,et al.  Corrections to Canonical expressions in Boolean algebra , 1938, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[63]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  Janet Wiles,et al.  Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  Joanna Masel,et al.  Mutations Leading to Loss of Sporulation Ability in Bacillus subtilis Are Sufficiently Frequent to Favor Genetic Canalization , 2007, Genetics.

[66]  Luis Mateus Rocha,et al.  Enput power in the wild-type basin of attraction of the spatial SPN model. , 2013 .

[67]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[68]  Carlos Gershenson,et al.  Introduction to Random Boolean Networks , 2004, ArXiv.