Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.

BACKGROUND Short-stemmed hip implants were introduced to conserve proximal bone mass and may facilitate the use of minimally invasive surgery, in which smaller incisions limit access to the joint. This limited access may increase the risk of surgical mal-positioning of the implant, however the sensitivity of femoral loading to such mal-positioning of a short-stemmed implant has not been studied. METHODS Finite element models were developed of a femur and a short-stemmed implant positioned to reproduce the intact hip centre, as well as with the implant placed in increased anteversion or offset. The effect of these surgical variables on femoral loading was examined for walking and stair climbing using loads from a validated musculoskeletal model. Results of the implanted models were compared with an intact model to evaluate stress shielding. FINDINGS Implant position had little influence on cortical strains along the length of the diaphysis, although strains decreased by up to 95% at the neck resection level compared to the intact femur. In the proximal Gruen zones I and VII strain energy density among the implanted models varied by up to 0.4 kJ/m(3) (28%) and 0.6 kJ/m(3) (24%) under walking and stair climbing, respectively. All implanted models showed characteristic proximal stress shielding, indicated by a decrease in strain energy density of up to 5.4 kJ/m(3) (69%) compared to the intact femur. INTERPRETATION Small changes in stem placement would likely have little influence on the internal loading of the femur after bone ingrowth has been achieved, however a reduction in strain energy density and therefore stress shielding was seen even for a short-stemmed implant, which may have consequences for longer-term bone remodelling.

[1]  M. Hartzband Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. , 2004, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[2]  R. Eastell,et al.  Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  A. Amis,et al.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  W. Taylor,et al.  Surgical Approach Influences Periprosthetic Femoral Bone Density , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  M Honl,et al.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A. Tsao,et al.  Bone sparing surgical options for total hip replacement. , 2003, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[8]  A. Amis,et al.  The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  C. Engh,et al.  What We Have Learned About Long-Term Cementless Fixation From Autopsy Retrievals , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  A. Cappello,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  N. Sugano,et al.  Correlation between femoral neck version and strain on the femur after insertion of femoral prosthesis , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[12]  W. Taylor,et al.  THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  W. Taylor,et al.  Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  D R Sumner,et al.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  E. Schneider,et al.  Variability of femoral muscle attachments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  W H Harris,et al.  Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  P. Herberts,et al.  The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: Finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Bassam A Masri,et al.  Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. , 2004, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[24]  B. Morrey,et al.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  William R Taylor,et al.  Tibio‐femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  D. Lester,et al.  Radiological changes in second- and third-generation Zweymüller stems. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  H. Grundei,et al.  Die ESKA- (CUT-)Endoprothese , 2004, Der Orthopäde.

[30]  M. Heller,et al.  Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Jan Schmitt,et al.  Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty--patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[32]  Yongxin Zhou,et al.  Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.