Accurate theoretical chemistry with coupled pair models.

Quantum chemistry has found its way into the everyday work of many experimental chemists. Calculations can predict the outcome of chemical reactions, afford insight into reaction mechanisms, and be used to interpret structure and bonding in molecules. Thus, contemporary theory offers tremendous opportunities in experimental chemical research. However, even with present-day computers and algorithms, we cannot solve the many particle Schrodinger equation exactly; inevitably some error is introduced in approximating the solutions of this equation. Thus, the accuracy of quantum chemical calculations is of critical importance. The affordable accuracy depends on molecular size and particularly on the total number of atoms: for orientation, ethanol has 9 atoms, aspirin 21 atoms, morphine 40 atoms, sildenafil 63 atoms, paclitaxel 113 atoms, insulin nearly 800 atoms, and quaternary hemoglobin almost 12,000 atoms. Currently, molecules with up to approximately 10 atoms can be very accurately studied by coupled cluster (CC) theory, approximately 100 atoms with second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), approximately 1000 atoms with density functional theory (DFT), and beyond that number with semiempirical quantum chemistry and force-field methods. The overwhelming majority of present-day calculations in the 100-atom range use DFT. Although these methods have been very successful in quantum chemistry, they do not offer a well-defined hierarchy of calculations that allows one to systematically converge to the correct answer. Recently a number of rather spectacular failures of DFT methods have been found-even for seemingly simple systems such as hydrocarbons, fueling renewed interest in wave function-based methods that incorporate the relevant physics of electron correlation in a more systematic way. Thus, it would be highly desirable to fill the gap between 10 and 100 atoms with highly correlated ab initio methods. We have found that one of the earliest (and now almost forgotten) of this class of methods, the coupled-electron pair approximation (CEPA), performs exceedingly well in chemical applications. In this Account, we examine the performance of CEPA in chemical applications. One attractive feature of CEPA, in addition to its surprising accuracy that surpasses that of DFT and MP2 theory, is a simplicity that allows for straightforward and very efficient approximations and extensions to be developed; these are much more difficult or even impossible with the more rigorous CC theory. Thus, approximate CEPA methods can be implemented efficiently enough to allow for calculations on molecules of 50-100 atoms, perhaps the most common range in contemporary chemical research.

[1]  S. Grimme,et al.  Theoretical thermodynamics for large molecules: walking the thin line between accuracy and computational cost. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[2]  Wilfried Meyer,et al.  PNO–CI Studies of electron correlation effects. I. Configuration expansion by means of nonorthogonal orbitals, and application to the ground state and ionized states of methane , 1973 .

[3]  S. Grimme Improved second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory by separate scaling of parallel- and antiparallel-spin pair correlation energies , 2003 .

[4]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[5]  F. Neese,et al.  A comparative study of single reference correlation methods of the coupled-pair type , 2008 .

[6]  F. Weigend,et al.  Efficient use of the correlation consistent basis sets in resolution of the identity MP2 calculations , 2002 .

[7]  Geoffrey P. F. Wood,et al.  A restricted-open-shell complete-basis-set model chemistry. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  Robert G. Parr,et al.  Density Functional Theory of Electronic Structure , 1996 .

[9]  Claus Ehrhardt,et al.  The coupled pair functional (CPF). A size consistent modification of the CI(SD) based on an energy functional , 1985 .

[10]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  PDDG/PM3 and PDDG/MNDO: Improved semiempirical methods , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation , 1997 .

[12]  H. Lischka,et al.  PNO-CI (pair natural-orbital configuration interaction) and CEPA-PNO (coupled electron pair approximation with pair natural orbitals) calculations of molecular systems. , 1975 .

[13]  P Pulay,et al.  Local Treatment of Electron Correlation , 1993 .

[14]  F. Neese,et al.  Efficient and accurate local approximations to coupled-electron pair approaches: An attempt to revive the pair natural orbital method. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  N. Hush,et al.  The coupled-pair approximation in a basis of independent-pair natural orbitals , 1976 .

[16]  D. Truhlar,et al.  A new local density functional for main-group thermochemistry, transition metal bonding, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  S. Grimme Seemingly simple stereoelectronic effects in alkane isomers and the implications for Kohn-Sham density functional theory. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  Tom Ziegler The 1994 Alcan Award Lecture Density functional theory as a practical tool in studies of organometallic energetics and kinetics. Beating the heavy metal blues with DFT , 1995 .

[19]  B. Ruscic,et al.  W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: In pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Donald G Truhlar,et al.  Representative Benchmark Suites for Barrier Heights of Diverse Reaction Types and Assessment of Electronic Structure Methods for Thermochemical Kinetics. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr , 1994 .

[22]  S. Grimme,et al.  How to compute isomerization energies of organic molecules with quantum chemical methods. , 2007, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[23]  A. Becke,et al.  A unified density-functional treatment of dynamical, nondynamical, and dispersion correlations. II. Thermochemical and kinetic benchmarks. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  R. Ahlrichs,et al.  Many body perturbation calculations and coupled electron pair models , 1979 .

[25]  Dana Vuzman,et al.  Double-hybrid functionals for thermochemical kinetics. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[26]  Stefan Grimme,et al.  Improved third‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  Jan M.L. Martin,et al.  Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities , 2001 .

[28]  Wilfried Meyer,et al.  Configuration Expansion by Means of Pseudonatural Orbitals , 1977 .

[29]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  Local perturbative triples correction (T) with linear cost scaling , 2000 .

[30]  F. Weigend,et al.  Gaussian basis sets of quadruple zeta valence quality for atoms H–Kr , 2003 .

[31]  Frank Neese,et al.  An improvement of the resolution of the identity approximation for the formation of the Coulomb matrix , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  W. Klopper,et al.  Basis set limit coupled cluster study of h-bonded systems and assessment of more approximate methods. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[33]  Jirí Cerný,et al.  Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.