Prostate cancer detection: Fusion of cytological and textural features

A computer-assisted system for histological prostate cancer diagnosis can assist pathologists in two stages: (i) to locate cancer regions in a large digitized tissue biopsy, and (ii) to assign Gleason grades to the regions detected in stage 1. Most previous studies on this topic have primarily addressed the second stage by classifying the preselected tissue regions. In this paper, we address the first stage by presenting a cancer detection approach for the whole slide tissue image. We propose a novel method to extract a cytological feature, namely the presence of cancer nuclei (nuclei with prominent nucleoli) in the tissue, and apply this feature to detect the cancer regions. Additionally, conventional image texture features which have been widely used in the literature are also considered. The performance comparison among the proposed cytological textural feature combination method, the texture-based method and the cytological feature-based method demonstrates the robustness of the extracted cytological feature. At a false positive rate of 6%, the proposed method is able to achieve a sensitivity of 78% on a dataset including six training images (each of which has approximately 4,000x7,000 pixels) and 1 1 whole-slide test images (each of which has approximately 5,000x23,000 pixels). All images are at 20X magnification.

[1]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  James Diamond,et al.  The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. , 2004, Human pathology.

[6]  M. Mason,et al.  Cytology of the prostate , 1964, Journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  N. Caraway,et al.  Metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: cytologic features and clinical findings. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S. Diaconescu,et al.  Nucleolar morphometry in prostate cancer. , 2010 .

[10]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Boosted Bayesian Multiresolution Classifier for Prostate Cancer Detection From Digitized Needle Biopsies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  J. A. Kiernan,et al.  Histological & histochemical methods : theory and practice , 1990 .

[12]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Gland Segmentation and Computerized Gleason Grading of Prostate Histology by Integrating Low-, High-level and Domain Specific Information , 2007 .

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automated Gland Segmentation and Classification for Gleason Grading of Prostate Tissue Images , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.