A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English.

This study compares the duration and first two formants (F1 and F2) of 11 nominal monophthongs and five nominal diphthongs in Standard Southern British English (SSBE) and a Northern English dialect. F1 and F2 trajectories were fitted with parametric curves using the discrete cosine transform (DCT) and the zeroth DCT coefficient represented formant trajectory means and the first DCT coefficient represented the magnitude and direction of formant trajectory change to characterize vowel inherent spectral change (VISC). Cross-dialectal comparisons involving these measures revealed significant differences for the phonologically back monophthongs /ɒ, ɔː, ʊ, uː/ and also /зː/ and the diphthongs /eɪ, əʊ, aɪ, ɔɪ/. Most cross-dialectal differences are in zeroth DCT coefficients, suggesting formant trajectory means tend to characterize such differences, while first DCT coefficient differences were more numerous for diphthongs. With respect to VISC, the most striking differences are that /uː/ is considerably more diphthongized in the Northern dialect and that the F2 trajectory of /əʊ/ proceeds in opposite directions in the two dialects. Cross-dialectal differences were found to be largely unaffected by the consonantal context in which the vowels were produced. The implications of the results are discussed in relation to VISC, consonantal context effects and speech perception.

[1]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Roel Smits,et al.  An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Kate Bunton,et al.  Identification of synthetic vowels based on a time-varying model of the vocal tract area function. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  David Deterding,et al.  The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation , 1997, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[8]  T. M. Nearey.  Vowel Inherent Spectral Change in the Vowels of North American English , 2013 .

[9]  Václav Jonáš Podlipský,et al.  Native dialect matters: perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Foulkes,et al.  Language in the British Isles: Phonological variation in England , 2007 .

[11]  P. Kerswill,et al.  New towns and koineization: linguistic and social correlates , 2005 .

[12]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Cross-Dialectal Differences in Dynamic Formant Patterns in American English Vowels , 2013 .

[13]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Context-specific acoustic differences between Peruvian and Iberian Spanish vowels. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Regional dialect variation in the vowel systems of typically developing children. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison.  Theories of Vowel Inherent Spectral Change , 2013 .

[16]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese , 2009 .

[18]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Constraints on the Transfer of Perceptual Learning in Accented Speech , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  P. Iverson,et al.  Plasticity in vowel perception and production: a study of accent change in young adults. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. House.  On Vowel Duration in English , 1961 .

[21]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Sound Change and Speaker Identity: An Acoustic Study , 2007, Speaker Classification.

[22]  Su-Hyun Jin,et al.  The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Tim Green,et al.  Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  A. Simpson,et al.  Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  James Hillenbrand,et al.  Static and Dynamic Approaches to Vowel Perception , 2013 .

[26]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification , 1986 .

[27]  P. Kerswill,et al.  Reversing “drift”: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system , 2008, Language Variation and Change.

[28]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Winifred Strange,et al.  Perceptual invariance of coarticulated vowels over variations in speaking rate. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. Mayr,et al.  A cross-dialectal acoustic study of the monophthongs and diphthongs of Welsh , 2011, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[31]  P. Iverson,et al.  Vowel normalization for accent: an investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Erika S. Levy,et al.  Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. Morrison.  Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  Vowel Inherent Spectral Change in Forensic Voice Comparison , 2009 .

[35]  A. McMahon.  An introduction to English phonology , 2001 .

[36]  Paola Escudero,et al.  The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[37]  P. Escudero,et al.  Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Emmanuel Ferragne,et al.  Formant frequencies of vowels in 13 accents of the British Isles , 2010, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[39]  J. Harrington,et al.  Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.