Enhancing the Multivariate Signal of [15O] water PET Studies with a New Non-Linear Neuroanatomical Registration Algorithm

This paper addresses the problem of neuro-anatomical registration across individuals for functional [15O] water PET activation studies. A new algorithm for three-dimensional (3-D) nonlinear structural registration (warping) of MR scans is presented. The method performs a hierarchically scaled search for a displacement field, maximizing one of several voxel similarity measures derived from the two-dimensional (2-D) histogram of matched image intensities, subject to a regularizer that ensures smoothness of the displacement field. The effect of the nonlinear structural registration is studied when it is computed on anatomical MR scans and applied to coregistered [15O] water PET scans from the same subjects: in this experiment, a study of visually guided saccadic eye movements. The performance of the nonlinear warp is evaluated using multivariate functional signal and noise measures. These measures prove to be useful for comparing different intersubject registration approaches, e.g., affine versus nonlinear. A comparison of 12-parameter affine registration versus non-linear registration demonstrates that the proposed nonlinear method increases the number of voxels retained in the cross-subject mask. We demonstrate that improved structural registration may result in an improved multivariate functional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, registration of PET scans using the 12-parameter affine transformations that align the coregistered MR images does not improve registration, compared to 12-parameter affine alignment of the PET images directly.

[1]  A. Toga,et al.  Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Nonlinear versus Linear Models in Functional Neuroimaging: Learning Curves and Generalization Crossover , 1997, IPMI.

[3]  S. C. Strother,et al.  Multidimensional state-spaces for fMRI and PET activation studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[4]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Mutual Information for Automated Unwarping of Rat Brain Autoradiographs , 1997, NeuroImage.

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[6]  M I Miller,et al.  Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Activation pattern reproducibility: Measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[10]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  S. Strother,et al.  Quantitative Comparisons of Image Registration Techniques Based on High‐Resolution MRI of the Brain , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  S. Strother,et al.  Scaled Subprofile Model: A Statistical Approach to the Analysis of Functional Patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Detection, visualization and animation of abnormal anatomic structure with a deformable probabilistic brain atlas based on random vector field transformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automated 3D nonlinear deformation procedure for determination of gross morphometric variability in human brain , 1994, Other Conferences.

[17]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  R. Somorjai,et al.  The registration of MR images using multiscale robust methods. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  Yali Amit,et al.  A Nonlinear Variational Problem for Image Matching , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[22]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .

[23]  J R Moeller,et al.  A Regional Covariance Approach to the Analysis of Functional Patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[24]  R. Koeppe,et al.  Anatomic standardization: linear scaling and nonlinear warping of functional brain images. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic 3D Regional MRI Segmentation and Statistical Probability Anatomy Maps , 1996 .

[26]  C. Davatzikos Spatial normalization of 3D brain images using deformable models. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  Y. Kosugi,et al.  Neural Network Mapping for Nonlinear Stereotactic Normalization of Brain MR Images , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[29]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[30]  M. Bro-Nielsen,et al.  Comparison of three lters in the solution of the Navier-Stokes equation in registration , 1997 .

[31]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Incorporating connected region labelling into automated image registration using mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[32]  R. Woods,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and the Scaled Subprofile Model Compared to Intersubject Averaging and Statistical Parametric Mapping: I. “Functional Connectivity” of the Human Motor System Studied with [15O]Water PET , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[33]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A multivariate analysis of PET activation studies , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[36]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[38]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.