Movement perception in computer-driven visual displays

Computer-driven visual displays (CDVDs), like television and movies, produce stroboscopic rather than continuous physical movement. The success with which the perception of motion is produced depends or. factors such as the fineness of the raster and the temporal and spatiai reiationships of the stimulus points. For a given velocity, the more points there are on the movement trajectory, and the closer their spacing, the better is the perceived movement. Moderately slow retinal velocities (on the order of .4 to .8 deg/sec) produce the highest quality of perceived movement. One can discriminate among possible subclasses of movement detectors by presenting a complex sequence of intensities at two or more points and varying their cross correlation. Motion between two areas can be perceived even when there is zero correlation between the spatial patterns in each location. Perceived motion can be of rotation, as well as of translation. The two-dimensional shadow of a rotating three-dimensional wire figure is perceived as a rotating, rigid, three-dimensional wire figure (the kinetic depth effect). A three-dimensional “shadow” of a hypothetical four-dimensional wire figure also has been produced; it was not seen as rigid.

[1]  E. Boring Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[2]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Gibson,et al.  Continuous perspective transformations and the perception of rigid motion. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[5]  White Bw The computer as a pattern generator for perceptual research. , 1961 .

[6]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[7]  B. W. White Stimulus-conditions affecting a recently discovered stereoscopic effect. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  G. Sperling A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[9]  A. Michael Noll,et al.  Computers and the Visual Arts , 1966 .

[10]  C. F. Hempstead Motion perception using oscilloscope display , 1966, IEEE Spectrum.

[11]  A. Michael Noll A computer technique for displaying n-dimensional hyperobjects , 1967, CACM.

[12]  B. Julesz,et al.  Differences between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception. , 1968, Vision research.

[13]  G. Sperling Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[14]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[15]  George Sperling,et al.  Stereoscopic visual displays: Principles, viewing devices, alignment procedures , 1971 .

[16]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Apparent movement with subjective contours. , 1973, Vision research.

[17]  JOHN Ross,et al.  Stereopsis by binocular delay , 1974, Nature.