A preliminary approach to the ALFRED reactor control strategy

Abstract In this paper, a preliminary approach to the definition of a suitable control strategy for the Advanced Lead Fast Reactor European Demonstrator (ALFRED), developed within the European 7th Framework Program, has been undertaken. The Generation IV reactors offer new challenges for what concerns the nuclear power plant control since several constraints both on primary and secondary loops have to be faced, differently from the conventional Light Water Reactors. A simulator of the ALFRED plant has been developed in a previous work ( Ponciroli et al., 2014 ) with the main purpose of studying the system free dynamics and stability features in a control-oriented perspective. Based on the outcomes of these investigations, in the present work, the possibility of adopting decentralized control schemes has been investigated. Accordingly, Single Input Single Output control laws have been applied directly to the selected couples of input–output variables, which have been identified first on the basis of the preliminary plant dynamics analyses, and then confirmed by the indications of the Relative Gain Array method. Afterwards, two different control schemes have been studied depending on the number of available inputs, and then implemented and compared in order to evaluate the effect of each control action on the associated potential control strategy effectiveness. As a last step, the ALFRED control system has been finalized. The regulator design has been set up based on a simultaneous feedforward-feedback scheme incorporating four closed feedback loops. A controlled power reduction and a controlled overpower transient have been simulated in order to assess the performance of the two proposed control schemes. Results show that both the adopted control strategies can assure an efficient control of the thermal power while guaranteeing an effective control of lead and steam temperatures as well. In addition, some non-negligible differences between the two schemes have been observed and discussed in the simulation results of control and controlled variables.

[1]  Marco Enrico Ricotti,et al.  Modelling and control strategy of the Italian LBE-XADS , 2006 .

[2]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning , 1995 .

[3]  Katsuhiko Ogata,et al.  Modern Control Engineering , 1970 .

[4]  John A. Bernard.  Light Water Reactor Control Systems , 1999 .

[5]  Antonio Cammi,et al.  Object-oriented modelling and simulation for the ALFRED dynamics , 2014 .

[6]  Hilding Elmqvist,et al.  Object-oriented modeling of hybrid systems , 1993 .

[7]  Cheng-Ching Yu,et al.  The relative gain for non-square multivariable systems , 1990 .

[8]  Sara Bortot,et al.  Stability analyses for the European LFR demonstrator , 2013 .

[9]  B. Moore.  Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[10]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[11]  J. M. Douglas,et al.  Relative gain array for units in plants with recycle , 1987 .

[12]  Lorenzo Damiani,et al.  Conceptual design of a bayonet-tube steam generator for the ALFRED lead-cooled reactor , 2013 .

[13]  U. S. Doe.  A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems , 2002 .

[14]  J. Lewins.  Nuclear reactor kinetics and control , 1978 .

[15]  Antonio Cammi,et al.  A preliminary approach to the MSFR control issues , 2014 .

[16]  Johan Carlsson,et al.  Comparison of sodium and lead-cooled fast reactors regarding reactor physics aspects, severe safety and economical issues , 2006 .

[17]  Peter A. Fritzson,et al.  Principles of object-oriented modeling and simulation with Modelica 2.1 , 2004 .

[19]  E. Bristol.  On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[20]  A. Laub,et al.  Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms , 1987 .