Contract–Management Capacity in Municipal and County Governments

Under pressure to do more with less, governments across the country have moved from direct service provision to providing services by contract. Proponents argue that contracting can reduce costs and improve flexibility and customer satisfaction. Critics point to a growing number of failed contracts, arguing there are numerous pitfalls associated with contracting. Missing from these debates is a discussion of how governments’ managerial capacity can improve contract performance. In this article, we identify specific capacities that governments can use to harness the promise of contracting while avoiding its pitfalls. We present analyses of data on municipal and county government contracting activities that show how governments invest in contract– management capacity in response to several internal and external threats to effective contract performance. Because government investment in contract–management capacity is uneven—that is, some governments invest in less capacity even when circumstances would call for more—our analyses may help to explain why some contract arrangements are more successful than others.

[1]  Linda Deleon,et al.  The Political Theory of Reinvention , 2000 .

[2]  J. Gargan Consideration of Local Government Capacity , 1981 .

[3]  Elizabeth A. Graddy,et al.  Production Costs, Transaction Costs, and Local Government Contractor Choice , 1991 .

[4]  Robert Hebdon,et al.  Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives , 2001 .

[5]  Carolyn J. Heinrich Organizational form and performance: An empirical investigation of nonprofit and for‐profit job‐training service providers , 2000 .

[6]  J. Greene How Much Privatization , 1996 .

[7]  M. Landau Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap , 1969 .

[8]  W. Hirsch Contracting out by Urban Governments , 1995 .

[9]  O. Williamson The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  John Stuart Mill,et al.  A CAPACITY-BUILDING FRAMEWORK: A SEARCH FOR CONCEPT AND PURPOSE , 1981 .

[11]  R. England,et al.  The Two Faces of Privatization , 1988 .

[12]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Strategies for Avoiding the Pitfalls of Performance Contracting , 1999 .

[13]  M. Brown,et al.  A "Smarter, Better, Faster, and Cheaper" Government: Contracting and Geographic Information Systems , 1998 .

[14]  H. Brinton Milward,et al.  Symposium on the Hollow State: Capacity, Control, and Performance in Interorganizational Settings , 1996 .

[15]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy , 1998 .

[16]  C. Wise,et al.  Public Service Configurations and Public Organizations: Public Organization Design in the Post-Privatization Era , 1990 .

[17]  S. Haque,et al.  The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance , 2001 .

[18]  R. Moe Exploring the Limits of Privatization , 1987 .

[19]  James L. Perry,et al.  COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE IN URBAN BUS TRANSIT: ASSESSING PRIVATIZATION STRATEGIES , 1986 .

[20]  George Alexander Boyne,et al.  Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in U.S. Local Government , 1998 .

[21]  Allan W. Lerner,et al.  Bureaucracy, Organizational Redundancy, and the Privatization of Public Services , 1995 .