The "Self-Disclosure" and "Self-Presentation" Views of Item Response Dynamics and Personality Scale Validity

This study investigates whether objective self-report measures of personality are better regarded as sources of factual information about the self (i.e., as selfdisclosures) or as ways to instruct others about how one is to be regarded (i.e., as self-presentations). The two perspectives were compared by testing the unique, divergent predictions each perspective made about the kinds of personality variables associated with consistency in self-description. For three groups of subjects (155 normal adults, 69 murderers, and 47 college students) almost all of the "self-presentation variables" were correlated significantly with consistency, whereas none of the "self-disclosure variables" was correlated with the criterion. Limitations of the study are discussed.

[1]  Joan K. Bollenbacher.  Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests. , 1975 .

[2]  Robert Hogan,et al.  A role theoretical interpretation of personality scale item responses , 1978 .

[3]  Mark Snyder,et al.  When actions reflect attitudes: The politics of impression management , 1976 .

[4]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. , 1979 .

[5]  Leonard G. Rorer.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965 .

[6]  Harold Sigall,et al.  The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. , 1971 .

[7]  R. Wylie,et al.  The Self Concept , 1962 .

[8]  S. Jourard,et al.  The transparent self : self-disclosure and well-being , 1964 .

[9]  Lawrence S. Wrightsman,et al.  Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological approach , 1974 .

[10]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[11]  R. Cattell.  Personality and mood by questionnaire. , 1973 .

[12]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  R. Hogan,et al.  The theory and measurement of empathy. , 1973 .

[14]  R. Hogan,et al.  Development of an empathy scale. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  K. Scheibe.  The psychologist's advantage and its nullification: Limits of human predictability. , 1978 .

[16]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Principles of social psychology , 1977 .

[17]  T. Sarbin,et al.  Conformance in role perception as a personality variable. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[18]  P. Slovic,et al.  Importance of test item content: An analysis of a corollary of the deviation hypothesis. , 1967 .

[19]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Moral judgments and self-presentations , 1981 .

[20]  Jack Block,et al.  The challenge of response sets , 1965 .

[21]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  A Model of Item Ambiguity in Personality Assessment1 , 1963 .

[22]  H. Gough.  The frame of reference of the thematic apperception test. , 1948, Journal of clinical psychology.

[23]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[24]  D. Jackson,et al.  Personality Structure and Assessment , 1980 .

[25]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[26]  L. Coyne,et al.  MMPI performance, response set, and the "self-concept hypothesis". , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  Jack Block,et al.  Lives Through Time , 1983 .